In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field
The crystal structure has been determined at 3.0 A resolution for an unphosphorylated STAT1 (1-683) complexed with a phosphopeptide derived from the alpha chain of interferon gamma (IFNgamma) receptor. Two dimer interfaces are seen, one between the N domains (NDs) (amino acid residues 1-123) and the other between the core fragments (CFs) (residues 132-683). Analyses of the wild-type (wt) and mutant STAT1 proteins by static light scattering, analytical ultracentrifugation, and coimmunoprecipitation suggest that STAT1 is predominantly dimeric prior to activation, and the dimer is mediated by the ND interactions. The connecting region between the ND and the CF is flexible and allows two interconvertable orientations of the CFs, termed "antiparallel" or "parallel," as determined by SH2 domain orientations. Functional implications of these dimer conformations are discussed. Also revealed in this structure is the detailed interaction between STAT1 SH2 domain and its docking site on IFNgamma receptor.
IFN-␥ treatment of cells leads to tyrosine phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 1 followed by dimerization through a reciprocal Src homology 2-phosphotyrosine interaction near the -COOH end of each monomer, forming a parallel structure that accumulates in the nucleus to drive transcription. Prompt dephosphorylation and return to the cytoplasm completes the activation-inactivation cycle. Nonphosphorylated STATs dimerize, and a previously described interface between N-terminal domain (ND) dimers has been implicated in this dimerization. A new crystal structure of nonphosphorylated STAT1 containing the ND dimer has two possible configurations for the body of STAT1, one of which is antiparallel. In this antiparallel structure, the Src homology 2 domains are at opposite ends of the dimer, with the coiled:coil domain of one monomer interacting reciprocally with the DNA-binding domain of its partner. Here, we find that mutations in either the coiled:coil͞DNA-binding domain interface or the ND dimer interface block dimerization of nonphosphorylated molecules and cause a resistance to dephosphorylation in vivo and resistance to a tyrosine phosphatase in vitro. We conclude that a parallel STAT1 phosphodimer not bound to DNA most likely undergoes a conformational rearrangement (parallel to antiparallel) to present the phosphotyrosine efficiently for dephosphorylation.dephosphorylation ͉ structural rearrangement S ignal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs) are latent cytoplasmic transcription factors that can be activated by a variety of tyrosine kinases in response to many different cytokine, growth factor, and peptide ligands binding to their respective cell surface receptors. Accumulation in the nucleus of tyrosine phosphorylated STAT dimers is followed by DNA binding, activation of target gene transcription, dephosphorylation, and return to the cytoplasm (1). The crystal structure of the phosphodimer core (amino acids 130-712), bound to DNA, showed a reciprocal phosphotyrosine (pY)-Src homology 2 (SH2) interaction at one end of a parallel dimer (2), with the DNA separating the monomers along the long axis of the monomers. Mao et al. (3) have now described a dimeric structure of nonphosphorylated STAT1, including the core (amino acids 130-712), as well as the core plus the N-terminal domain (ND) (amino acids 1-683). (The terminal 29 aa, 684-712, in the core were unstructured and omitted from study.) The body of each of the monomers in the nonphosphorylated structure is identical to the monomers in the previously reported phosphorylated dimer (2). However, the monomers in the nonphosphorylated core structure are arranged differently in space. In contrast to the dimeric, parallel structure of the phosphorylated STAT1, the SH2 domains in the nonphosphorylated core structure project from the opposite ends of an antiparallel dimer with a dimeric interface formed by reciprocal contacts between the coiled:coil (CC) and DNA-binding domains (DBD) of the monomers. In the crystal...
An increasing number of studies demonstrate that autophagy, an intrinsic mechanism that can degrade cytoplasmic components, is involved in the infection processes of a variety of pathogens. It can be hijacked by various viruses to facilitate their replication. In this study, we found that PRRSV infection significantly increases the number of double- or single-membrane vesicles in the cytoplasm of host cells in ultrastructural analysis. Our results showed the LC3-I was converted into LC3-II after virus infection, suggesting the autophagy machinery was activated. We further used pharmacological agents and shRNAs to confirm that autophagy promoted the replication of PRRSV in host cells. Confocal microscopy analysis showed that PRRSV inhibited the fusion between autophagosomes and lysosomes, suggesting that PRRSV induced incomplete autophagy. This suppression caused the accumulation of autophagosomes which may serve as replication site to enhance PRRSV replication. It has been shown that NSP2 and NSP3 of arterivirus are two components of virus replication complex. We also found in our studies that NSP2 colocalized with LC3 in MARC-145 cells by performing confocal microscopy analysis and continuous density gradient centrifugation. Our studies presented here indicated that autophagy was activated during PRRSV infection and enhanced PRRSV replication in host cells by preventing autophagosome and lysosome fusion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.