Motor impairment after stroke is generally caused by damage to the neural networks that control movement. Corticomuscular coherence (CMC) is a valid method to analyze the functional connectivity of the corticospinal pathway between the cerebral cortex and muscles. However, current studies on CMC in stroke patients only focused on the upper limbs. The functional connectivity between the brain and lower limbs in stroke patients has not been well studied. Therefore, twelve stroke patients and fifteen healthy controls were recruited and their electroencephalogram (EEG) and electromyogram (EMG) of Tibialis Anterior (TA), Lateral Gastrocnemius (LG) and Medial Gastrocnemius (MG) during unilateral static ankle dorsiflexion were recorded. We found the mean beta and gamma CMC values of Cz electrode of stroke patients were significantly lower than those of healthy controls (p < 0.05). The brain topography showed significant coherence in the center of the cerebral cortex in healthy controls, while there was no significant coherence in stroke patients. For clinical assessment, there was a significant positive correlation between CMC and lower limb Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) for Cz-TA in beta band (r = 0.6296, p = 0.0282), Cz-LG in beta band (r = 0.6816, p = 0.0147), and Cz-MG in gamma band (r = 0.6194, p = 0.0317). A multiple linear regression model was established between CMC and lower limb FMA (R 2 = 0.6600,

No abstract

Error-related potentials (ErrPs) have provided technical support for the brain-computer interface. However, different visual stimulations may affect the ErrPs, and furthermore, affect the error recognition based on ErrPs. Therefore, the study aimed to investigate how people respond to different visual stimulations (static and dynamic) and find the best time window for different stimulation. Nineteen participants were recruited in the ErrPs-based tasks with static and dynamic visual stimulations. Five ErrPs were statistically compared, and the classification accuracies were obtained through linear discriminant analysis (LDA) with nine different time windows. The results showed that the P3, N6, and P8 with correctness were significantly different from those with error in both stimulations, while N1 only existed in static. The differences between dynamic and static errors existed in N1 and P2. The highest accuracy was obtained in the time window related to N1, P3, N6, and P8 for the static condition, and in the time window related to P3, N6, and P8 for the dynamic. In conclusion, the early components of ErrPs may be affected by stimulation modes, and the late components are more sensitive to errors. The error recognition with static stimulation requires information from the entire epoch, while the late windows should be focused more within the dynamic case.