Oil–brine
interfaces play an important role in oil recovery and oil–brine
separation, in which the effects of salinity on interfacial tension
(IFT) have been much of debate in the past in experiments and modeling
studies owing to complex oil compositions. In this work, we use molecular
dynamics (MD) simulations to study the oil–brine interfacial
properties by designing seven systems containing different oil compositions
(decane with/without polar compounds) and the salinity in brine of
up to ∼14 wt %. We carefully investigate the salinity and polar
component effects by analyzing IFTs, density profiles, orientation
parameters, hydrogen bond densities, and charge density profiles.
The results indicate that O-bearing compounds (phenol and decanoic
acid) can significantly reduce the oil–brine IFT and exhibit
the highest Gibbs surface excess relative to water, while the others,
including N-bearing compounds (pyridine and quinoline) and S-bearing
compounds (thiophene and benzothiophene), only slightly decrease the
oil–brine IFTs and show a relatively small Gibbs surface excess.
Increasing salinity can slightly increase the oil–brine IFT
except in the system containing phenol, which shows a decrease. Phenol
and decanoic acid incline to be perpendicular to the interface and
generate numerous hydrogen bonds with water in the interfacial region,
while others prefer to be parallel to the interface with much fewer
hydrogen bonds with water. On the other hand, salinity has an insignificant
effect on the orientation of polar molecules and hydrogen bond density
in the interfacial region. The charges at the interfaces on the brine
and oil sides are negative and positive, respectively, and the polar
compounds disturb the arrangement of water molecules in the interfacial
regions, while the addition of salt ions result in the higher peak
values of charges in terms of water and system. Our study should provide
new insights into the oil–brine interfacial issues and clarify
some unsettled disputes.
Surfactant–polymer (SP) flooding has significant potential to enhance oil recovery after water flooding in mature reservoirs. However, the economic benefit of the SP flooding process is unsatisfactory under low oil prices. Thus, it is necessary to reduce the chemical costs and improve SP flooding efficiency to make SP flooding more profitable. Our goal was to maximize the incremental oil recovery of the SP flooding process after water flooding by using the equal chemical consumption cost to ensure the economic viability of the SP flooding process. Thus, a systematic study was carried out to investigate the SP flooding process under different injection strategies by conducting parallel sand pack flooding experiments to optimize the SP flooding design. Then, the comparison of the remaining oil distribution after water flooding and SP flooding under different injection strategies was studied. The results demonstrate that the EOR efficiency of the SP flooding process under the alternating injection of polymer and surfactant–polymer (PASP) is higher than that of conventional simultaneous injection of surfactant and polymer. Moreover, as the alternating cycle increases, the incremental oil recovery increases. Based on the analysis of fractional flow, incremental oil recovery, and remaining oil distribution when compared with the conventional simultaneous injection of surfactant and polymer, the alternating injection of polymer and surfactant–polymer (PASP) showed better sweep efficiency improvement and recovered more remaining oil trapped in the low permeability zone. Thus, these findings could provide insights into designing the SP flooding process under low oil prices.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.