Background
The prevalence and cancer-specific death rate of lung cancer (LC) have risen in recent decades. A universally applicable prognostic signature for both adenocarcinoma LC (LUAD) and squamous cell carcinoma LC (LUSC) is still lacking.
Methods
A total of 453 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-LUAD cohort and 452 patients from TCGA-LUSC cohort were enrolled, and a prognostic model was constructed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis based on the consensus prognostic genes in both cohorts. The newly defined pan-lung cancer risk count (PLCRC) of each patient was calculated via the summation formula.
Results
A total of 23 genes were selected for the calculation of the PLCRC. The PLCRC showed a moderate prognostic value in the entire (p < 0.001, HR: 2.75, AUC: 0.643), LUAD (p < 0.001, HR: 2.51, AUC: 0.636) and LUSC (p < 0.001, HR: 2.89, AUC: 0.656) cohorts. The PLCRC was an independent prognostic factor after adjusting the clinical features. The PLCRC was also effective in nine external validation cohorts and in patients with different clinical features. Activation of extracellular matrix pathways and infiltration of immunocytes promoted the tumorigenesis and development of both LUAD and LUSC. We generated a universally applicable prognostic signature, the PLCRC, which could dichotomize patients with significantly different clinical outcomes and guide the clinical treatment of LC patients. Chemotherapy is more suitable for patients with a low PLCRC, while anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 immunotherapy is more suitable for patients with a high PLCRC.
Conclusion
We established and validated a newly defined prognostic signature, the PLCRC, for both LUAD and LUSC patients and provided clinical strategies for patients from different risk subgroups.
Background
Lung cancer is still the most fatal cancer today with approximately 30%-40% of these patients will develop bone metastasis. Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common and aggressive type of lung cancer. The relationship between LUAD and bone metastasis and its underlying mechanism remains unclear. This study proved that epidermal growth factor-like domain multiple 6 (EGFL6) was highly expressed in LUAD specimens of patients, and the expression level was positively correlated with bone metastasis of LUAD.
Method
The expression of EGFL6 in cancer tissues was detected by IHC. CCK-8, colony formation assay, migration and invasion assay, wound healing assay, immunocytochemistry, RT-PCR, Western blotting, ELISA, bone resorption, TRAP staining and H&E staining were performed. A nude mouse model of LUAD-induced bone destruction was established by injecting A549 cells in different EGFL6 expression levels.
Results
EGFL6 is elevated in LUAD and is associated with bone metastasis. In vivo, implantation of human adenocarcinoma A549 cells with a higher expression of EGFL6 not only increased tumor growth rate but also bone resorption of tibias in nude mice. In vitro, the secretion of EGFL6 from A549 cells increased osteoclast differentiation but had little effect on osteogenic differentiation. To reveal the underlying mechanism, we demonstrated that EGFL6 enhanced osteoclast differentiation through activating nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) and downstream c-Fos/NFATc1 signaling pathways, and in addition promoted the proliferation, migration and invasion of A549 cells through enhancing the epithelial mesenchymal transformation (EMT) and promoting Wnt/β-catenin and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways.
Conclusions
We unveil EGFL6 as a predictor in bone metastasis of LUAD and underscore the relevance of EGFL6 as a therapeutic target.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.