As a continuation of our earlier study (J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 4334-4343) we conformationally restricted the sigma-receptor ligand 2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-N-[2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]-N-methylethylamine (1) by incorporating it into a series of homologous piperazines 3-9 and homopiperazines 10 and 11, diazabicyclononanes and decanes, bridgehead bicyclooctanes and nonanes as well as other miscellaneous compounds. sigma-Receptor binding affinities were obtained using [3H](+)-pentazocine in guinea pig brain membrane sigma 1 sites. The studies suggest that the nitrogen lone pair orientation found in the piperazines affords the strongest binding interaction. Other nitrogen lone pair orientations or compounds representing unlikely staggered conformations of 1 [ as in 4-[2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]-1,4-diazabicyclo[3.2.2]nonane (16)] show very weak sigma interaction. Comparison of the binding data of different N-substituted homologues of 1 with those of the 1-[2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]-4-alkylpiperazines suggests that the two nitrogen atoms of 1 are working in opposition to one another in terms of their sensitivity to steric bulk. The high binding affinity of the 1,4-diazabicyclo[4.3.0]nonanes 12 suggests that these may approximate the methyl and pyrrolidine ring conformations found in 1 when it is bound to the sigma receptor. Compound 12 exhibited a 4-fold enantioselectivity favoring (+)-12. The synthesis of 6,7-dichloro-2-[[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)ethyl]amino]tetralin (19) and its desmethyl derivative 20 permitted constraint of the 3,4-dichlorophenyl and N-methyl moieties of 1 into a gauche orientation. The binding data suggests that this conformation in 1 favors strong binding interaction at sigma-receptors. sigma-Receptor Ki's ranged from 0.55 nM for 1-[2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]-4-n-butylpiperazine (7) to 654 nM for 16. Overall comparison of the results indicate that 1 is subject to considerable conformational freedom and suggests that the sigma receptor is not subject to rigid stereochemical restraints with 1. These results add to our earlier study where we restrained 1 using simple monocyclic heterocycles.
2-, 3-, and 4-idophenyl derivatives of the high-affinity sigma ligand N-[2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]-N-methyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)ethylamine (1) were synthesized in two to four steps starting from N-methyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)ethylamine. These compounds were evaluated for their capacity to label both sigma 1 and sigma 2 subtypes in vitro. sigma-1 binding affinity was determined by measuring competition with [3H]-(+)-pentazocine binding to guinea pig brain membranes while sigma 2 binding was evaluated through competition with [3H]DTG binding to rat liver membranes in the presence of excess dextrallorphan. The binding data revealed that N-[2-(3-iodophenyl)ethyl]-N-methyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)ethylamine (2) and N-[2-(4-iodophenyl)ethyl]-N-methyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)ethylamine (3) displayed almost identical binding affinity at sigma 1 sites to the parent compound 1. This suggests that the 3- or 4-iodo group can effectively substitute for the 3,4-dichloro substituents of 1. In this series of compounds, Ki's at the sigma 1 site varied from 2.0 nM for N-(4-iodobenzyl)-N-methyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)ethylamine (6) to 26.6 nM for N-(2-iodobenzyl)-N-methyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)ethylamine (4). Ki's for sigma 2 site ranged from 8.1 nM for 1 to 220 nM for N-(3-bromobenzyl)-N-methyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)ethylamine (11) while the sigma 2/sigma 1 ratio varied from 1.8 for 4 to 25 for 11. Comparing halogen substitution, the trend Cl = I > Br > F was observed for binding affinity at sigma 1 sites; no such trend was observed at sigma 2 sites. On the basis of the binding data, compounds 2 and 3 were selected for labeling with 123I. Thus, treatment of the corresponding 3- and 4-(tributylstannyl) intermediates (7 and 8) with Na123I in the presence of excess CH3CO3H furnished [123I]-2 and [123I]-3 in up to 70% radiochemical yield. Preliminary in vitro binding with [123I]-3 indicated up to 97% specific binding with guinea pig brain membranes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.