Background: Research into multiple-bar Nuss operations for the treatment of wide-range or significantly asymmetric pectus excavatum is rarely reported. This paper aims to explore the curative effects of multiplebar Nuss operations on wide-range or significantly asymmetric pectus excavatum. Methods:We reviewed the clinical data of 153 patients with pectus excavatum who were treated in our hospital from September 2006 to August 2014. All the patients had wide-range or significantly asymmetric pectus excavatum and underwent multiple-bar Nuss operations performed by the author.Results: All 153 patients agreed to undergo the operation. The median age was 17 y (10.2-41 y). The median Haller index was 3.98 (3.2-25). One hundred and fifty-one patients accepted treatment with two bars, and 2 cases accepted treatment with three bars. The median operation time was 123 min (65-500 min), the median blood loss was 20 mL (2-200 mL), and the median postoperative hospital stay was 6 days (3-33 days).The incidence rates of pleural effusion, pneumothorax and hydropneumothorax that required drainage treatment were 0.7% (1/153), 1.3% (2/153) and 3.3% (5/153), respectively. Displacement of a bar occurred in one case, and bar exposure occurred in 7 cases. Therefore, 2 cases had the bars removed early, within 2 years postoperation. One patient with severe depression (Haller index: 8.8) had an unhealed auxiliary incision of the xiphoid process, and although the incision was cured after the early removal of the inferior bar, the deformity recurred. There were no cases of death. Currently, 51.6% (79/153) of the cases have had the bars removed. The most recent follow-up revealed that patients' median satisfaction score for the surgical correction effect was 9 points (10 points indicated full satisfaction).Conclusions: For patients with significantly asymmetric and severely deformed pectus excavatum, the multiple-bar Nuss operation not only is safe and effective but can also achieve a better cosmetic appearance.However, we should continue to explore technical improvements.
Background:The current study attempted to describe the specific patterns of pathological tumor response and locoregional node metastases from surgically resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NAIC), as well as to explore the association between clinicopathological characteristics and such oncological patterns.Methods: Fifty-one patients with cT3 or deeper esophageal squamous cell cancer underwent subtotal esophagectomy after NAIC. The NAIC regimen included intravenous administration of platinum-based and docetaxel-and taxane-based chemotherapeutics along with a 200 mg fixed dose of one programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, given every 3 weeks. We divided patients into tumor/nodal good-responders and poor-responders based on the pathological observation of the tumor or nodal responses. We also examined the association between clinicopathological factors and tumor/nodal responses. Further, significant baseline predictors for tumor and nodal good-responders were identified using multivariate binary logistic regression.Results: Of the 51 patients, 68.6% achieved marked primary tumor response. Notably, 21.6% of patients achieved complete pathological response. Significant differences in treatment cycles between tumor good-responders and tumor poor-responders (P = 0.019) were observed. For locoregional nodal responses, only 33.3% of patients achieved down-staged nodal disease. Of the investigated variables, neoadjuvant cycles (odds ratio (OR): 5.271, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.278 -21.740, P = 0.022) and pretreatment platelets (OR: 0.979, 95% CI: 0.962 -0.996, P = 0.017) were identified as independent predictors for good tumor and nodal responses. Conclusions:We conclusively noted that most patients receiving NAIC were tumor good-responders, whereas only one-third of patients were nodal good-responders. Furthermore, we identified that treatment cycle number and baseline platelet counts were independent predictors of combined tumor and nodal responses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.