Current evidence suggests that center-based CR is acceptable for patients with CHD. As home- and tele-based CR can save time, money, effort, and resources and may be preferred by patients, their efficacy should be investigated further in subsequent studies.
). The funding sources had no involvement in the study design; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Few studies to date address the predictive ability of CHADS-VASc and RCHADS in CAD patients. Our aim is to investigate the prognostic performance of CHADS, CHADS-VASc and RCHADS scores in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Angiographically obstructive CAD patients were enrolled. The prognostic performance of the three risk scores was evaluated using Cox hazards models. In addition, we compared their predictive values by calculating C statistics, net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). The endpoints are death from any cause and cardiovascular death. Of 3295 subjects with CAD, the mean CHADS, CHADS-VASc and RCHADS scores are 1.2 ± 1.0, 2.4 ± 1.4, and 1.6 ± 1.4, respectively. The CHADS-guided risk classification is markedly distinct from CHADS--VASc- and RCHADS-guided ones. Over a median follow-up of 24 months, a total of 290 (rate 4.00/100 person-year) deaths occurred, and 163 (rate 2.2/100 person-year) were attributed to cardiovascular deaths. Event rates increase by CHADS, CHADS-VASc and RCHADS (P for trend <0.001). The multivariate analyses show 60, 111 and 82% higher risk of mortality per unit increase of CHADS, CHADS-VASc and RCHADS scores, respectively. Comparing with CHADS score (c-statistic = 0.61), CHADS-VASc (c-statistic 0.65, NRI 0.52 and IDI 0.06, P for all <0.05) and RCHADS (c-statistic 0.66, NRI 0.43 and IDI 0.09, P for all <0.05) scores provide better discrimination and reclassification for mortality. Also, CHADS-VASc and RCHADS have comparable predictive ability of mortality to the GRACE score. The CHADS, CHADS-VASc and RCHADS scores are simple yet robust prognostic tools in CAD patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.