Halogenation of drugs is commonly used to enhance membrane binding and permeation. We quantify the effect of replacing a hydrogen residue by a chlorine or a trifluoromethyl residue in position C-2 of promazine, perazine, and perphenazine analogues. Moreover, we investigate the influence of the position (C-6 and C-7) of residue CF(3) in benzopyranols. The twelve drugs are characterized by surface activity measurements, which yield the cross-sectional area, the air-water partition coefficient, and the critical micelle concentration. By using the first two parameters (A(D) and K(aw)) and the appropriate membrane packing density, the lipid-water partition coefficients, are calculated in excellent agreement with the lipid-water partition coefficients measured by means of isothermal titration calorimetry for small unilamellar vesicles of 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine. Replacement of a hydrogen residue by a chlorine and a trifluoromethyl residue enhances the free energy of partitioning into the lipid membrane, on average by deltaG(lw) approximately -1.3 or -4.5 kJ mol(-1), respectively, and the permeability coefficient by a factor of approximately 2 or approximately 9, respectively. Despite exhibiting practically identical hydrophobicities, the two benzopyranol analogues differ in their permeability coefficients by almost an order of magnitude; this is due to their different cross-sectional areas at the air-water and lipid-water interfaces.
P-glycoprotein-ATPase is an efflux transporter of broad specificity that counteracts passive allocrit influx. Understanding the rate of allocrit transport therefore matters. Generally, the rates of allocrit transport and ATP hydrolysis decrease exponentially with increasing allocrit affinity to the transporter. Here we report unexpectedly strong down-modulation of the P-glycoprotein-ATPase by certain detergents. To elucidate the underlying mechanism, we chose 34 electrically neutral and cationic detergents with different hydrophobic and hydrophilic characteristics. Measurement of the P-glycoprotein-ATPase activity as a function of concentration showed that seven detergents activated the ATPase as expected, whereas 27 closely related detergents reduced it significantly. Assessment of the free energy of detergent partitioning into the lipid membrane and the free energy of detergent binding from the membrane to the transporter revealed that the ratio, q, of the two free energies of binding determined the rate of ATP hydrolysis. Neutral (cationic) detergents with a ratio of q = 2.7 ± 0.2 (q > 3) followed the aforementioned exponential dependence. Small deviations from the optimal ratio strongly reduced the rates of ATP hydrolysis and flopping, respectively, whereas larger deviations led to an absence of interaction with the transporter. P-glycoprotein-ATPase inhibition due to membrane disordering by detergents could be fully excluded using (2)H-NMR-spectroscopy. Similar principles apply to modulating drugs.
We assessed the interaction of three electrically neutral detergents (Triton X-100, C(12)EO(8), and Tween 80) with P-glycoprotein (ABCB1, MDR1) and identified the molecular elements responsible for this interaction. To this purpose we titrated P-glycoprotein in inside-out plasma membrane vesicles of MDR1-transfected mouse embryo fibroblasts (NIH-MDR1-G185) with the detergents below their critical micelle concentration, CMC. The P-glycoprotein ATPase measured as a function of the detergent concentration yielded bell-shaped activity curves which were evaluated with a two-site binding model. The lipid-water partition coefficient and the transporter-water binding constant of the detergents were measured independently. Knowledge of these two parameters allowed assessment of the free energy of detergent binding to P-glycoprotein in the lipid membrane, DeltaG(tl)(0), that reflects the direct detergent-transporter affinity. It increased as the number of ethoxyl groups increased, suggesting that these hydrogen bond acceptor groups are the key elements for the detergent-transporter interaction in the lipid membrane. The free energy of binding to P-glycoprotein per ethoxyl group (EO) was determined as approximately DeltaG(EO)(0)=-1.6 kJ/mol. The present findings moreover document that, depending on the concentration applied, detergents are intrinsic substrates for, or inhibitors of P-glycoprotein.
P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) moves allocrits from the cytosolic to the extracellular membrane leaflet, preventing their intrusion into the cytosol. It is generally accepted that allocrit binding from water to the cavity lined by the transmembrane domains occurs in two steps, a lipid-water partitioning step, and a cavity-binding step in the lipid membrane, whereby hydrogen-bond (i.e., weak electrostatic) interactions play a crucial role. The remaining key question was whether hydrophobic interactions also play a role for allocrit binding to the cavity. To answer this question, we chose polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers, C(m)EO(n), varying in the number of methylene and ethoxyl residues as model allocrits. Using isothermal titration calorimetry, we showed that the lipid-water partitioning step was purely hydrophobic, increasing linearly with the number of methylene, and decreasing with the number of ethoxyl residues, respectively. Using, in addition, ATPase activity measurements, we demonstrated that allocrit binding to the cavity required minimally two ethoxyl residues and increased linearly with the number of ethoxyl residues. The analysis provides the first direct evidence, to our knowledge, that allocrit binding to the cavity is purely electrostatic, apparently without any hydrophobic contribution. While the polar part of allocrits forms weak electrostatic interactions with the cavity, the hydrophobic part seems to remain associated with the lipid membrane. The interplay between the two types of interactions is most likely essential for allocrit flipping.
The ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporters ABCG2 and ABCB1 perform ATP hydrolysis-dependent efflux of structurally highly diverse compounds, collectively called allocrites. Whereas much is known about allocrite-ABCB1 interactions, the chemical nature and strength of ABCG2-allocrite interactions have not yet been assessed. We quantified and characterized interactions of allocrite with ABCG2 and ABCB1 using a set of 39 diverse compounds. We also investigated potential allocrite binding sites based on available transporter structures and structural models. We demonstrate that ABCG2 binds its allocrites from the lipid membrane, despite their hydrophilicity. Hence, binding of allocrite to both transporters is a two-step process, starting with a lipid-water partitioning step, driven mainly by hydrophobic interactions, followed by a transporter binding step in the lipid membrane. We show that binding of allocrite to both transporters increases with the number of hydrogen bond acceptors in allocrites. Scrutinizing the transporter translocation pathways revealed ample hydrogen bond donors for allocrite binding. Importantly, the hydrogen bond donor strength is, on average, higher in ABCG2 than in ABCB1, which explains the higher measured affinity of allocrite for ABCG2. π-π stacking and π-cation interactions play additional roles in binding of allocrite to ABCG2 and ABCB1. With this analysis, we demonstrate that these membrane-mediated weak electrostatic interactions between transporters and allocrites allow for transporter promiscuity toward allocrites. The different sensitivities of the transporters to allocrites' charge and amphiphilicity provide transporter specificity. In addition, we show that the different hydrogen bond donor strengths in the two transporters allow for affinity tuning.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.