Background: The non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are promising treatments in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). We conducted a meta-analysis to explore the efficacy and safety of the non-steroidal MRAs (finerenone, apararenone, esaxerenone) and detect the differences among them.Methods: We searched several databases for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating non-steroidal MRAs versus placebo in patients with CKD and T2D. We performed a conventional meta-analysis separately, and then indirect comparisons for efficacy and safety outcomes were conducted among these included drugs.Results: Eight RCTs with 14,450 subjects were enrolled. In patients with CKD and T2D, a greater reduction in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) (WMD −0.40, 95% CI −0.48 to −0.32, p < 0.001), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (WMD −2.69, 95% CI −4.47 to −0.91, p = 0.003), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (WMD −4.84, 95% CI −5.96 to −3.72, p < 0.001) and a higher risk of hyperkalemia (RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.86 to 2.30, p < 0.001) were observed in the non-steroidal MRAs versus placebo; there is no significant difference in the incidence of serious adverse events between two groups (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.79, p = 0.067). Compared with finerenone, esaxerenone showed no significant difference in UACR reduction (WMD 0.24, 95% CI −0.016 to 0.496, p = 0.869); apararenone and esaxerenone showed greater decreases in SBP (WMD 1.37, 95% CI 0.456 to 2.284, p = 0.010; WMD 3.11, 95% CI 0.544 to 5,676, p = 0.021).Conclusions: Despite the moderate increased risk of hyperkalemia, use of non-steroidal MRAs could reduce proteinuria and SBP in patients with CKD and T2D. In terms of renoprotection, esaxerenone and finerenone may have similar effects. Esaxerenone and apararenone may have better antihypertensive effects than finerenone. The head-to-head RCTs are still needed to compare the differences of the efficacy and safety in these non-steroidal MRAs.

Background The effect of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on risk of hyperglycemia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains ambiguous. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between ICS use and the incidence of hyperglycemia related adverse effects in COPD patients. Methods Medline/PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to 25 May 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ICS versus control (non-ICS) treatment for COPD patients reporting on risk of hyperglycemia were included. The Mantel–Haenszel method with fixed-effects modeling was used to calculate pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Seventeen RCTs with 43,430 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled results suggested that there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of hyperglycemia between the ICS group and the control group (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.90–1.16, P = 0.76). In addition, no significant difference was noted in the effect on glucose level (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.79–1.82, P = 0.40), risk of diabetes progression (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.20–3.51, P = 0.81) and new onset diabetes mellitus (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.88–1.15, P = 0.95) between the ICS group and the control group. These findings also were consistent across all subgroup analyses. Conclusions Use of ICS does not have an effect on the blood glucose and is not associated with the risk of new onset diabetes mellitus and diabetes progression in patients with COPD. Further RCTs exploring the association between ICS use and risk of hyperglycemia in COPD patients are still needed to verify our results of this analysis.

Drug addiction is a chronic relapsing brain disease. Alterations of glucose uptake and metabolism are found in the brain of drug addicts. Insulin mediates brain glucose metabolism and its abnormality could induce brain injury and cognitive impairment. Here, we established a rat model of phenobarbital addiction by 90 days of dose escalation and evaluated addiction-related symptoms. We also performed 18 Ffluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to detect glucose uptake in the brain and proteomic analysis of the function of the differentially expressed (DE) proteins via bioinformatics in brain tissues by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC−MS/MS) on days 60 and 90 of phenobarbital or 0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose sodium (CMC-Na) (vehicle) administration. The results showed that phenobarbital-addictive rats developed severe withdrawal symptoms after abstinence and glucose uptake was significantly increased in the brain. Proteomics analysis showed that numerous DE proteins were enriched after phenobarbital administration, among which CALM1, ARAF, and Cbl proteins (related to the insulin signaling pathway) were significantly downregulated on day 60 but not day 90. However, SLC27A3 and NF-κB1 proteins (related to insulin resistance) were significantly upregulated on day 90 (data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD021101). Our data indicate that the insulin signaling pathway and insulin resistance may play a role in the development of phenobarbital addiction and brain injury, so the findings may have important clinical implications.

BACKGROUND: Although systemic corticosteroids (SCS) have long been used to treat patients with COPD exacerbation, the recommended dose remains controversial. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis and an indirect treatment comparison to investigate the efficacy and safety of different doses of SCS in subjects with COPD exacerbation. METHODS: Studies were identified by searching different databases for randomized controlled trials that investigated the efficacy and safety of SCS with placebo in subjects with exacerbation of COPD. The different doses of SCS were assigned to low-dose (ie, initial dose^40 mg prednisone equivalent/d [PE/d]), mediumdose (initial dose 5 40-100 mg PE/d, and high-dose (initial dose > 100 mg PE/d) groups. The indirect treatment comparison was performed between low-, medium-, and high-dose SCS groups. RESULTS: Twelve trials with 1,375 participates were included. Compared to placebo, the risk of treatment failure was lower in the low-dose SCS groups (risk ratio 0.61 [95% CI 0.43-0.88], P 5 .007) and high-dose SCS groups (risk ratio 0.64 [95% CI 0.48-0.85], P 5 .002); the FEV 1 was significantly improved in low-dose (mean difference 0.09 [95% CI 0.06-0.12], P < .001), medium-dose (mean difference 0.23 [95% CI 0.02-0.44], P 5 .036), and high-dose SCS groups (mean difference 0.09, [95% CI 0.03-0.15], P < .001, respectively). Regarding safety, the incidence of hyperglycemia was higher in high-dose SCS groups versus placebo (risk ratio 2.52 [95% CI 1.13-5.62], P 5 .02). The indirect comparison between low-, medium-, and high-dose SCS found that the risk of treatment failure and changes in FEV 1 were similar between these doses of SCS. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis indicates that low-dose SCS (initial dose4 0 mg PE/d) was sufficient and safer for treating subjects with COPD exacerbation, and it was noninferior to higher doses of SCS (initial dose > 40 mg PE/d) in improving FEV 1 and reducing the risk of treatment failure. However, our findings need to be verified in head-to-head randomized controlled trials.