BackgroundPretreatment inflammatory factors, including neutrophil, lymphocyte, platelet and monocyte counts as well as the ratios between them such as neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet–lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte–monocyte ratio (LMR) have been suggested as potential prognostic predictors for patients with prostate cancer (PCa). However, the prognostic effects remain controversial. Therefore, the goal of this study was evaluate the prognostic values of these markers for PCa patients using a meta-analysis.MethodsPotentially relevant publications in PubMed and Cochrane Library were searched. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence free survival (RFS) and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) were determined using a fixed or random effects model by STATA 13.0 software.ResultsThirty-two studies involving 21,949 participants were included. Our pooled results demonstrated that a high pretreatment NLR (HR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.37–1.76), PLR (HR = 1.72; 95% CI 1.36–2.18), neutrophil (HR = 1.10; 95% CI 1.03–1.18 and monocyte counts (HR = 2.25; 95% CI 1.67–3.05) predicted inferior OS, while elevated pretreatment LMR (HR = 2.27; 95% CI 1.76–2.94) was correlated with favorable OS. Furthermore, the higher NLR (HR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.29–2.04) and monocyte counts (HR = 1.75; 95% CI 1.36–2.25), but lower LMR predicted worse PFS (HR = 2.18; 95% CI 1.58–3.02); poor RFS was only associated with NLR (HR = 1.12; 95% CI 1.04–1.20). The subgroup analysis showed that the higher NLR may be a predictive factor for OS only in patients with mCRPC and undergoing chemotherapy; while the higher PLR was only significantly associated with OS in localized PCa regardless of treatment.ConclusionThis meta-analysis reveals that pretreatment NLR, PLR, LMR, neutrophil, and monocyte counts may be effective predictive biomarkers for prognosis in patients with PCa.

ABSTRACT. Previous case-control studies on the relationship between the CYP4F2 gene rs2108622 polymorphism and hypertension have produced contrasting results. In this study, we aimed to further evaluate the relationship between the CYP4F2 gene rs2108622 polymorphism and hypertension. We selected four case-control studies related to the CYP4F2 gene rs2108622 polymorphism and hypertension by searching PubMed, EMBase, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and the Wanfang database. We utilized the Cochran Q-test and the I 2 index to measure the heterogeneity across studies. To merge the odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence interval (95%CI), we utilized the fixed and random-effect models during the analyses. The present study included 1878 patients with hypertension and 1512 healthy control subjects. By meta-analysis, we did not find any association of the CYP4F2 gene 15134©FUNPEC-RP www.funpecrp.com.br Genetics and Molecular Research 14 (4): 15133-15139 (2015) the CYP4F2 gene rs2108622 polymorphism was not associated with hypertension.