Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated in some non-phagocytic cells are implicated in mitogenic signalling and cancer. Many cancer cells show increased production of ROS, and normal cells exposed to hydrogen peroxide or superoxide show increased proliferation and express growth-related genes. ROS are generated in response to growth factors, and may affect cell growth, for example in vascular smooth-muscle cells. Increased ROS in Ras-transformed fibroblasts correlates with increased mitogenic rate. Here we describe the cloning of mox1, which encodes a homologue of the catalytic subunit of the superoxide-generating NADPH oxidase of phagocytes, gp91phox. mox1 messenger RNA is expressed in colon, prostate, uterus and vascular smooth muscle, but not in peripheral blood leukocytes. In smooth-muscle cells, platelet-derived growth factor induces mox1 mRNA production, while antisense mox1 mRNA decreases superoxide generation and serum-stimulated growth. Overexpression of mox1 in NIH3T3 cells increases superoxide generation and cell growth. Cells expressing mox1 have a transformed appearance, show anchorage-independent growth and produce tumours in athymic mice. These data link ROS production by Mox1 to growth control in non-phagocytic cells.

No abstract

Memory CD8 T cells that circulate in the blood and are present in lymphoid organs are an essential component of long-lived T cell immunity. These resting memory CD8 T cells remain poised to rapidly elaborate effector functions upon re-exposure to pathogen, but also have many properties in common with naïve cells, including the ability to migrate to lymph nodes and spleen, and their pluri-potency. Thus, memory cells embody features of both naïve and effector cells, fueling a long-standing debate centered on whether memory T cells develop from effector cells or directly from naïve cells1–4. To better define the developmental path of memory CD8 T cells we investigated changes in DNA methylation programming at naïve and effector genes in virus specific CD8 T cells during acute LCMV infection of mice. Methylation profiling of effector CD8 T cell subsets at day 4 and 8 after infection showed that, rather than retaining a naïve epigenetic state, the subset of cells that gives rise to memory cells acquired de novo DNA methylation programs at naïve-associated genes and became demethylated at loci of classically defined effector molecules. Conditional deletion of the de novo methyltransferase, Dnmt3a, at an early stage of effector differentiation strikingly reduced methylation of naïve-associated genes and resulted in faster re-expression of these naïve genes, accelerating memory cell development. Longitudinal phenotypic and epigenetic characterization of virus-specific memory-precursor CD8 T cells transferred into antigen-free mice revealed that their differentiation into memory cells was coupled to cell-division independent erasure of de novo methylation programs and re-expression of naïve-associated genes. These data provide evidence that epigenetic repression of naïve-associated genes in effector CD8 T cells can be reversed in cells that develop into long-lived memory CD8 T cells supporting a differentiation model where memory T cells arise from a subset of fate-permissive effector T cells.

The importance of autophagy in memory CD8 T cell differentiation in vivo is not well defined. We show here that autophagy is dynamically regulated in virus-specific CD8 T cells during acute lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection. Autophagy decreased in activated proliferating T cells, and was then upregulated at the peak of the effector T cell response. Consistent with this model, deletion of the key autophagy genes Atg7 or Atg5 in virus-specific CD8 T cells had minimal effect on generating effector cells but greatly enhanced their death during the contraction phase resulting in compromised memory formation. These findings provide insight into when autophagy is needed during effector and memory T cell differentiation in vivo and also warrant a re-examination of our current concepts about the relationship between T cell activation and autophagy.

No abstract