No abstract

IntroductionDue to the shortage of land and water resource, optimization of systems for production in commercial greenhouses is essential for sustainable vegetable supply. The performance of lettuce productivity and the economic benefit in greenhouses using a soil-based system (SBS) and a hydroponic production system (HPS) were compared in this study.MethodsExperiments were conducted in two identical greenhouses over two growth cycles (G1 and G2). Three treatments of irrigation volumes (S1, S2, and S3) were evaluated for SBS while three treatments of nutrient solution concentration (H1, H2, and H3) were evaluated for HPS; the optimal levels from each system were then compared.Results and discussionHPS was more sensitive to the effects of environmental temperature than SBS because of higher soil buffer capacity. Compared with SBS, higher yield (more than 134%) and higher water productivity (more than 50%) were observed in HPS. We detected significant increases in ascorbic acid by 28.31% and 16.67% and in soluble sugar by 57.84% and 32.23% during G1 and G2, respectively, compared with SBS. However, nitrate accumulated in HPS-grown lettuce. When the nutrient solution was replaced with fresh water 3 days before harvest, the excess nitrate content of harvested lettuce in HPS was removed. The initial investment and total operating cost in HPS were 21.76 times and 47.09% higher than those in SBS, respectively. Consideration of agronomic, quality, and economic indicators showed an overall optimal performance of the H2 treatment. These findings indicated that, in spite of its higher initial investment and requirement of advanced technology and management, HPS was more profitable than SBS for commercial lettuce production.

The light intensity is low in haze weather, and the facility is in a weak light environment for a long time. As a functional film, light conversion film (LCF) can improve the light conversion performance and is conducive to regulating the environment in the facility to promote crop growth. It can be seen from the test that the light transmittance of LCF under visible light conditions (400–780 nm) is 8.67% higher than that of ordinary film (OF), with stronger light transmittance. In the red–orange light band (600–700 nm), the LCF is 1.3% higher than that of the OF. Through the detection of irradiance, it was found that the irradiance was outdoor environment > LCF > OF in any weather. A two-year greenhouse experiment was conducted to study the effect of LCF on the whole growth process of facility agriculture (environment-soil-crop) under weak light. It is found that LCF reduces the air humidity by 0.47~2.83%; it has an obvious warming effect on the surface soil of greenhouse, and it is linearly correlated with temperature. In terms of crop growth, LCF significantly (p < 0.05) increased the photosynthetic rate at heading stage, and finally increased the yield, total soluble sugar and reduction-type Vitamin C by 8.97–39.53%, 9.22–30.14%, and 1.41–21.09%, respectively. In addition, considering the frequent haze weather in North China, the use of LCF can improve air temperature, CO2 concentration, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), and soil temperature, and it can effectively deal with the challenge of weak light. In conclusion, LCF can improve the facility environment and improve crop yield and quality, indicating that the implementation of LCF has potential benefits in solving crop yield reduction and quality decline in haze weather. In addition, as the main component of LCF, rare earth materials are a new type of clean energy, which can effectively promote the sustainable development of the agricultural ecosystem.