Donnai-Barrow syndrome (DBS) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutation in the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 2 gene (LRP2). Defects in this protein may lead to clinical multiple organ malformations by affecting the development of organs such as the nervous system, eyes, ears, and kidneys. Although some variations on LRP2 have been found to be associated with DBS, early diagnosis and prevention of patients with atypical DBS remains a challenge for many physicians because of their clinical heterogeneity. The objective of this study is to explore the association between the clinical presentation and the genotype of a DBS patient who was initially diagnosed with early-onset high myopia (eoHM) from a healthy Chinese family. To this end, we tested the patient of this family via whole exome sequencing and further verified the results among other family members by Sanger sequencing. Comprehensive ophthalmic tests as well as other systemic examinations were also performed on participants with various genotypes. Genetic assessment revealed that two novel variations in LRP2, a de novo missense variation (c.9032G>A; p.Arg3011Lys) and a novel splicing variation (c.2909-2A>T) inherited from the father, were both carried by the proband in this family, and they are strongly associated with the typical clinical features of DBS patients. Therefore, in this paper we are the first to report two novel compound heterozygous variations in LPR2 causing DBS. Our study extends the genotypic spectrums for LPR2-DBS and better assists physicians in predicting, diagnosing, and conducting gene therapy for DBS.
Purpose: The study aims to identify genetic variants in five Chinese families with Keratoconus (KC) and describe the characteristics of parental corneal topography.Methods: Fifteen participants, including five probands and ten parents from five Chinese families with KC, were recruited for genetic and clinical analyses. Targeted next-generation sequencing using a custom-designed panel for KC was applied on the probands for variant identification. Sanger sequencing and cosegregation analysis of the suspected pathogenic variants were performed on the family members. The pathogenicities of variants were evaluated according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines (ACMG). Pentacam 3D anterior segment analysis system was applied for keratectasia detection and the Corvis ST for corneal biomechanics measurement. Fifteen parameters were recorded, including nine keratectasia indicators (BAD-D, TP, Kmax, Df, Db, Dp, Dt, Da, ARTH), six corneal biomechanical indicators (CBI, DA ratio, SP-A1, IR, bIOP, TBI).Results: A total of six novel variants, including five missense variants and one frameshift variant, were detected in the HMX1, SLC4A11, TGFBI, PIKFYVE, and ZEB1 genes in five probands, all of which showed co-segregation of genotype and clinical phenotype and were determined to be pathogenic. The genetic model was autosomal dominant (AD) in four families and autosomal recessive (AR) in 1 family. The analysis of keratectasia and corneal biomechanical indicators of the proband’s parents (first-generation relatives) in AD families revealed that there were several abnormal indexes in BAD-D, TP, Kmax, Df, Db, Dp, Dt, Da, CBI, DA ratio, SP-A1, IR, bIOP and TBI test indexes, showing clinical characteristics of incipient KC.Conclusion: Our study shows that variants in HMX1, SLC4A11, TGFBI, PIKFYVE, and ZEB1 were associated with KC. Our study extends the gene spectrum associated with KC, provides novel insights into KC phenotypic assessments, and contributes to early diagnosis for these patients.
Background Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome (RSTS) is characterized by distinctive facial features, broad and often angulated thumbs and halluces, short stature, and moderate-to-severe intellectual disability, classified into two types RSTS1 (CREBBP-RSTS) and RSTS2 (EP300-RSTS). More often, the clinical features are inconclusive and the diagnosis of RSTS is established in a proband with identification of a heterozygous pathogenic variant in CREBBP or EP300 to confirm the diagnosis. Methods In this study, to describe an association between the clinical phenotype and the genotype of a RSTS2 patient who was initially diagnosed with severe early-onset high myopia (eoHM) from a healthy Chinese family, we tested the proband of this family by whole exome sequencing (WES) and further verified among other family members by Sanger sequencing. Real-time quantitative PCR was used to detect differences in the relative mRNA expression of candidate genes available in the proband and family members. Comprehensive ophthalmic tests as well as other systemic examinations were also performed on participants with various genotypes. Results Whole-exome sequencing revealed that the proband carried the heterozygous frameshift deletion variant c.3714_3715del (p.Leu1239Glyfs*3) in the EP300 gene, which was not carried by the normal parents and young sister as verified by Sanger sequencing, indicating that the variant was de novo. Real-time quantitative PCR showed that the mRNA expression of EP300 gene was lower in the proband than in other normal family members, indicating that such a variant caused an effect on gene function at the mRNA expression level. The variant was classified as pathogenic as assessed by the interpretation principles of HGMD sequence variants and ACMG guidelines. According to ACMG guidelines, the heterozygous frameshift deletion variant c.3714_3715del (p.Leu1239Glyfs*3) in the EP300 gene was more likely the pathogenic variant of this family with RSTS2. Conclusions Therefore, in this paper, we first report de novo heterozygous variation in EP300 causing eoHM-RSTS. Our study extends the genotypic spectrums for EP300-RSTS and better assists physicians in predicting, diagnosis, genetic counseling, eugenics guidance and gene therapy for EP300-RSTS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.