Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) can obtain tree point clouds with high precision and high density. The efficient classification of wood points and leaf points is essential for the study of tree structural parameters and ecological characteristics. Using both intensity and geometric information, we present an automated wood–leaf classification with a three-step classification and wood point verification. The tree point cloud was classified into wood points and leaf points using intensity threshold, neighborhood density and voxelization successively, and was then verified. Twenty-four willow trees were scanned using the RIEGL VZ-400 scanner. Our results were compared with the manual classification results. To evaluate the classification accuracy, three indicators were introduced into the experiment: overall accuracy (OA), Kappa coefficient (Kappa), and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). The ranges of OA, Kappa, and MCC of our results were from 0.9167 to 0.9872, 0.7276 to 0.9191, and 0.7544 to 0.9211, respectively. The average values of OA, Kappa, and MCC were 0.9550, 0.8547, and 0.8627, respectively. The time costs of our method and another were also recorded to evaluate the efficiency. The average processing time was 1.4 seconds per million points for our method. The results show that our method represents a potential wood–leaf classification technique with the characteristics of automation, high speed, and good accuracy.

No abstract

No abstract

Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) is a high-potential technology in forest surveys. Estimating the diameters at breast height (DBH) accurately and quickly has been considered a key step in estimating forest structural parameters by using TLS technology. However, the accuracy and speed of DBH estimation are affected by many factors, which are classified into three groups in this study. We adopt an additive error model and propose a simple and common simulation method to evaluate the impacts of three groups of parameters, which include the range error, angular errors in the vertical and horizontal directions, angular step width, trunk distance, slice thickness, and real DBH. The parameters were evaluated statistically by using many simulated point cloud datasets that were under strict control. Two typical circle fitting methods were used to estimate DBH, and their accuracy and speed were compared. The results showed that the range error and the angular error in horizontal direction played major roles in the accuracy of DBH estimation, the angular step widths had a slight effect in the case of high range accuracy, the distance showed no relationship with the accuracy of the DBH estimation, increasing the scanning angular width was relatively beneficial to the DBH estimation, and the algebraic circle fitting method was relatively fast while performing DBH estimation, as is the geometrical method, in the case of high range accuracy. Possible methods that could help to obtain accurate and fast DBH estimation results were proposed and discussed to optimize the design of forest inventory experiments.