Objective: This meta-analysis was designed to explore the association between the systemic immune–inflammation index (SII) and the therapeutic effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Materials & methods: The authors retrieved relevant studies published before May 25, 2022. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI was used to evaluate the relationship between SII and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: 14 articles comprising 2721 patients were included in this study. The pooled results proved that high SII levels were closely related to poor prognosis in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (OS HR = 2.40; 95% CI: 2.04–2.82; PFS HR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.33–1.86) and that an SII value of 750 was appropriate as a cut-off value (OS HR = 2.20; 95% CI: 1.83–2.63; PFS HR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.33–1.80). Conclusion: High SII levels (>750) may be an indicator of worse OS and PFS in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

BackgroundEarly identification of patients who will benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has recently become a hot issue in cancer immunotherapy. Peripheral cytokines are key regulators in the immune system that can induce the expression of immune checkpoint molecules; however, the association between peripheral cytokines and the efficiency of ICIs remains unclear.MethodsA systematic review was conducted in several public databases from inception through 3 February 2022 to identify studies investigating the association between peripheral cytokines (i.e., IL-1β, IL-2, IL-2RA, IL-2R, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-15, IL-17, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and TGF-β) and ICI treatment. Survival data, including overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS), were extracted, and meta-analyses were performed.ResultsTwenty-four studies were included in this analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that the pretreatment peripheral levels of IL-6 (univariate analysis: HR = 2.53, 95% CI = 2.21–2.89, p < 0.00001; multivariate analysis: HR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.67–2.93, p < 0.00001) and IL-8 (univariate analysis: HR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.98–2.38, p < 0.00001; multivariate analysis: HR = 1.88, 95% CI= 1.70–2.07, p < 0.00001) were significantly associated with worse OS of cancer patients receiving ICI treatment in both univariate and multivariate analysis. However, high heterogeneity was found for IL-6, which might be attributed to region, cancer type, treatment method, sample source, and detection method.ConclusionThe peripheral level of IL-8 may be used as a prognostic marker to identify patients with inferior response to ICIs. More high-quality prospective studies are warranted to assess the predictive value of peripheral cytokines for ICI treatment.

No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundThe fibrinogen-to-prealbumin ratio (FPR), a novel immune-nutritional biomarker, has been reported to be associated with prognosis in several types of cancer, but the role of FPR in the prognosis of resectable pancreatic cancer has not been elucidated.MethodsA total of 263 patients with resectable pancreatic cancer were enrolled in this study and were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 146) and a validation cohort (n = 117). Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to calculate the cut-off values of immune-nutritional markers. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariate Cox regression were performed in the training cohort to identify the independent risk factors, based on which the nomogram was established. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated and validation by the training and validation cohort, respectively.ResultsThe optimal cutoff value for FPR was 0.29. Multivariate analysis revealed that FPR, controlling nutritional status (CONUT), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage were independent predictors of overall survival (OS). The nomogram was established by involving the five factors above. The C-index of the training cohort and validation cohort were 0.703 (95% CI: 0.0.646-0.761) and 0.728 (95% CI: 0.671-0.784). Decision curve analysis and time-dependent AUC showed that the nomogram had better predictive and discriminative ability than the conventional TNM stage.ConclusionFPR is a feasible biomarker for predicting prognosis in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. The nomogram based on FPR is a useful tool for clinicians in making individualized treatment strategies and survival predictions.