In the autonomous driving process, the decision-making system is mainly used to provide macro-control instructions based on the information captured by the sensing system. Learning-based algorithms have apparent advantages in information processing and understanding for an increasingly complex driving environment. To incorporate the interactive information between agents in the environment into the decision-making process, this paper proposes a generalized single-vehicle-based graph neural network reinforcement learning algorithm (SGRL algorithm). The SGRL algorithm introduces graph convolution into the traditional deep neural network (DQN) algorithm, adopts the training method for a single agent, designs a more explicit incentive reward function, and significantly improves the dimension of the action space. The SGRL algorithm is compared with the traditional DQN algorithm (NGRL) and the multi-agent training algorithm (MGRL) in the highway ramp scenario. Results show that the SGRL algorithm has outstanding advantages in network convergence, decision-making effect, and training efficiency.

As one of the main elements of reinforcement learning, the design of the reward function is often not given enough attention when reinforcement learning is used in concrete applications, which leads to unsatisfactory performances. In this study, a reward function matrix is proposed for training various decision-making modes with emphasis on decision-making styles and further emphasis on incentives and punishments. Additionally, we model a traffic scene via graph model to better represent the interaction between vehicles, and adopt the graph convolutional network (GCN) to extract the features of the graph structure to help the connected autonomous vehicles perform decision-making directly. Furthermore, we combine GCN with deep Q-learning and multi-step double deep Q-learning to train four decision-making modes, which are named the graph convolutional deep Q-network (GQN) and the multi-step double graph convolutional deep Q-network (MDGQN). In the simulation, the superiority of the reward function matrix is proved by comparing it with the baseline, and evaluation metrics are proposed to verify the performance differences among decision-making modes. Results show that the trained decision-making modes can satisfy various driving requirements, including task completion rate, safety requirements, comfort level, and completion efficiency, by adjusting the weight values in the reward function matrix. Finally, the decision-making modes trained by MDGQN had better performance in an uncertain highway exit scene than those trained by GQN.

No abstract

No abstract