ObjectiveTo develop and validate a noninvasive radiomic-based machine learning (ML) model to identify P504s/P63 status and further achieve the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa).MethodsA retrospective dataset of patients with preoperative prostate MRI examination and P504s/P63 pathological immunohistochemical results between June 2016 and February 2021 was conducted. As indicated by P504s/P63 expression, the patients were divided into label 0 (atypical prostatic hyperplasia), label 1 (benign prostatic hyperplasia, BPH) and label 2 (PCa) groups. This study employed T2WI, DWI and ADC sequences to assess prostate diseases and manually segmented regions of interest (ROIs) with Artificial Intelligence Kit software for radiomics feature acquisition. Feature dimensionality reduction and selection were performed by using a mutual information algorithm. Based on screened features, P504s/P63 prediction models were established by random forest (RF), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), logistic regression (LR), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) and k-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithms. The performance was evaluated by the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and accuracy.ResultsA total of 315 patients were enrolled. Among the 851 radiomic features, the 32 top features were derived from T2WI, in which the gray-level run length matrix (GLRLM) and gray-level cooccurrence matrix (GLCM) features accounted for the largest proportion. Among the five models, the RF algorithm performed best in general evaluations (microaverage AUC=0.920, macroaverage AUC=0.870) and provided the most accurate result in further sublabel prediction (the accuracies of label 0, 1, and 2 were 0.831, 0.831, and 0.932, respectively). In comparative sequence analyses, T2WI was the best single-sequence candidate (microaverage AUC=0.94 and macroaverage AUC=0.78). The merged datasets of T2WI, DWI, and ADC yielded optimal AUCs (microaverage AUC=0.930 and macroaverage AUC=0.900).ConclusionsThe radiomic-based RF classifier has the potential to be used to evaluate the presurgical P504s/P63 status and further diagnose PCa noninvasively and accurately.
Objectives: To precisely predict PCa risk stratification, we constructed a machine learning (ML) model based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic features. Methods: Between August 2016 and May 2021, patients with histologically proven PCa who underwent preoperative MRI and prostate-specific antigen screening were included. The patients were grouped into different risk categories as defined by the EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines. Using Artificial Intelligence Kit software, PCa regions of interest were delineated and radiomic features were extracted. Subsequently, predictable models were built by utilizing five traditional ML approaches: support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), k-nearest neighbour (KNN) and random forest (RF) classifiers. The classification capacity of the developed models was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. Results: A total of 213 patients were enrolled, including 16 low-risk, 65 intermediate-risk, and 132 high-risk PCa patients. The risk stratification of PCa could be revealed by MRI radiomic features, and second-order features accounted for most of the selected features. Among the five established ML models, the RF model showed the best overall predictive performance (AUC = 0.87). After further analysis of the subgroups based on the RF model, the prediction of the high-risk group was the best (AUC = 0.89). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the MR radiomics-based ML method could be a promising tool for predicting PCa risk stratification precisely. Advances in knowledge: The ML models have valuable prospect for accurate PCa risk assessment, which might contribute to customize treatment and surveillance strategies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.