Aim The present study aimed to assess the benefits of two-stent techniques for patients with DEFINITION criteria-defined complex coronary bifurcation lesions. Methods and results In total, 653 patients with complex bifurcation lesions at 49 international centres were randomly assigned to undergo the systematic two-stent technique (two-stent group) or provisional stenting (provisional group). The primary endpoint was the composite of target lesion failure (TLF) at the 1-year follow-up, including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). The safety endpoint was definite or probable stent thrombosis. At the 1-year follow-up, TLF occurred in 37 (11.4%) and 20 (6.1%) patients in the provisional and two-stent groups, respectively [77.8%: double-kissing crush; hazard ratio (HR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30–0.90; P = 0.019], largely driven by increased TVMI (7.1%, HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20–0.90; P = 0.025) and clinically driven TLR (5.5%, HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19–1.00; P = 0.049) in the provisional group. At the 1 year after indexed procedures, the incidence of cardiac death was 2.5% in the provisional group, non-significant to 2.1% in the two-stent group (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.31–2.37; P = 0.772). Conclusion For DEFINITION criteria-defined complex coronary bifurcation lesions, the systematic two-stent approach was associated with a significant improvement in clinical outcomes compared with the provisional stenting approach. Further study is urgently warranted to identify the mechanisms contributing to the increased rate of TVMI after provisional stenting. Study registration http://www.clinicaltrials.com; Identifier: NCT02284750.

With improved performance characteristics in detecting CRC, the second-generation SEPT9 assay could play an important role in CRC screening and early detection.

Background The efficacy and factors associated with patient outcomes for a diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (LFD) compared with traditional dietary advice (TDA) based on modified National Institute for Clinical Excellence guidelines for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) in regions consuming a non-Western diet are unclear. Objectives We aimed to determine the efficacy of an LFD compared with TDA for the treatment of IBS-D in Chinese patients and to investigate the factors associated with favorable outcomes. Methods One hundred and eight Chinese IBS-D patients (Rome III criteria) were randomly assigned to an LFD or TDA. The primary endpoint was a ≥50-point reduction in the IBS Severity Scoring System at 3 wk. Fecal samples collected before and after the dietary intervention were assessed for changes in SCFAs and microbiota profiles. A logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of outcomes. Results Among the 100 patients who completed the study, the primary endpoint was met in a similar number of LFD (30 of 51, 59%) and TDA (26 of 49, 53%) patients (∆6%; 95% CI: −13%, 24%). Patients in the LFD group achieved earlier symptomatic improvement in stool frequency and excessive wind than those following TDA. LFD reduced carbohydrate-fermenting bacteria such as Bifidobacterium and Bacteroides, and decreased saccharolytic fermentation activity. This was associated with symptomatic improvement in the responders. High saccharolytic fermentation activity at baseline was associated with a higher symptom burden (P = 0.01) and a favorable therapeutic response to the LFD (log OR: 4.9; 95% CI: −0.1, 9.9; P = 0.05). Conclusions An LFD and TDA each reduced symptoms in Chinese IBS-D patients; however, the LFD achieved earlier symptomatic improvements in stool frequency and excessive wind. The therapeutic effect of the LFD was associated with changes in the fecal microbiota and the fecal fermentation index. At baseline, the presence of severe symptoms and microbial metabolic dysbiosis characterized by high saccharolytic capability predicted favorable outcomes to LFD intervention. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03304041.

BackgroundReconstruction of the aortic major branches during thoracic endovascular aortic repair is complicated because of the complex anatomic configuration and variation of the aortic arch. In situ laser fenestration has shown great potential for the revascularization of aortic branches. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of in situ laser fenestration on the three branches of the aortic arch during thoracic endovascular aortic repair.Methods and ResultsBefore clinical application, the polytetrafluoroethylene and Dacron grafts were fenestrated by an 810‐nm laser system ex vivo, which did not damage the bare metal portion of the endografts and created a clean fenestration while maintaining the integrity of the endografts. In vivo, 6 anesthetized female swine survived after this operation, including stent‐graft implantation in the aortic arches, laser fenestration, and conduit implantation through the innominate arteries and the left carotid arteries. Based on the animal experiments, in situ laser fenestration during thoracic endovascular aortic repair was successively performed on 24 patients (aged 33–86 years) with aortic artery diseases (dissection type A: n=4, type B: n=7, aneurysm: n=2, mural thrombus: n=7). Fenestration of 3 aortic branches was performed in 2 (8.3%) patients. Both the left carotid artery and the left subclavian artery were fenestrated in 6 (25%) patients. Only left subclavian artery fenestration surgery was done in 16 (66.7%) patients. Among these patients, 1 fenestration was abandoned secondary to an acute takeoff of the innominate artery in a type III aortic arch. The average operative time was 137±15 minutes. The technical success rate was 95.8% (n=23). No fenestration‐related complications or neurological morbidity occurred after this operation. During a mean postoperative 10‐month follow‐up (range: 2–17 months), 1 patient died of severe pneumonia, and all the left subclavian artery and carotid artery stents were patent with no fenestration‐related endoleaks upon computed tomography angiography images.ConclusionsIn situ laser fenestration is a feasible, effective, rapid, repeatable, and safe option for the reconstruction of aortic arch during thoracic endovascular aortic repair, which might be available to revascularize the 3 branches. However, follow‐up periods should be extended to evaluate the robustness of this technique.