Editor’s note: For easy download the posted pdf of the State of the Climate for 2019 is a low-resolution file. A high-resolution copy of the report is available by clicking here. Please be patient as it may take a few minutes for the high-resolution file to download.

Abstract:In this study, we compare specific humidity profiles derived from Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC) radio occultation (RO) from August to November 2006 with those from different types of radiosonde and from ECMWF global analysis. Comparisons show that COSMIC specific humidity data agree well with ECMWF analysis over different regions of the world for both day and night times. On the contrary, evaluation against COSMIC specific humidity shows a distinct dry bias of Shang-E radiosonde (China) and an obvious wet bias of VIZ-type (USA). No obvious specific humidity biases are found for MRZ (Russia) and MEISEI (Japan) radiosondes. These results demonstrate the usefulness of COSMIC water vapor for quantifying the dry/wet biases among different sensor types.

A COSMIC-1/FORMOSAT-3 (Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate-1 and Formosa Satellite Mission 3) follow-on mission, COSMIC-2/FORMOSAT-7, had been successfully launched into low-inclination orbits on 25 June 2019. COSMIC-2 has a significantly increased Signal-to-Noise ratio (SNR) compared to other Radio Occultation (RO) missions. This study summarized the initial assessment of COSMIC-2 data quality conducted by the NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR). We use validated data from other RO missions to quantify the stability of COSMIC-2. In addition, we use the Vaisala RS41 radiosonde observations to assess the accuracy and uncertainty of the COSMIC-2 neutral atmospheric profiles. RS41 is currently the most accurate radiosonde observation system. The COSMIC-2 SNR ranges from 200 v/v to about 2800 v/v. To see if the high SNR COSMIC-2 signals lead to better retrieval results, we separate the COSMIC-2–RS41 comparisons into different SNR groups (i.e., 0–500 v/v group, 500–1000 v/v group, 1000–1500 v/v group, 1500–2000 v/v group, and >2000 v/v group). In general, the COSMIC-2 data quality in terms of stability, precision, accuracy, and uncertainty of the accuracy is very compatible with those from COSMIC-1. Results show that the mean COSMIC-2–RS41 water vapor difference from surface to 5 km altitude for each SNR groups are equal to −1.34 g/kg (0–500 v/v), −1.17 g/kg (500–1000 v/v), −1.33 g/kg (1000–1500 v/v), −0.93 g/kg (1500–2000 v/v), and −1.52 g/kg (>2000 v/v). Except for the >2000 v/v group, the high SNR measurements from COSMIC-2 seem to improve the mean water vapor difference for the higher SNR group slightly (especially for the 1500–2000 v/v group) comparing with those from lower SNR groups.

[1] Temperature profiles derived from Global Positioning System (GPS) Radio Occultation (RO) data from the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC) mission are compared with those from four types of radiosonde systems from 12 to 25 km to assess the performance of these radiosonde systems in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere. Results show that temperature measurements from the Vaisala-RS92 and Shanghai radiosonde systems agree well with those of COSMIC with a close-to-zero mean difference. Large temperature biases are shown for the MRZ and VIZ-B2 radiosonde systems relative to COSMIC, which are probably caused by diurnal radiative effects. In addition, we show that the temperature measurements from a new Chinese radiosonde system are improved compared to those of an older system through a comparison with COSMIC measurements.