This study analysed the relationship between serum progesterone/oestradiol concentrations and IVF pregnancy outcomes in gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocols. A total of 2921 infertile women undergoing IVF were assigned to four groups according to serum progesterone and oestradiol concentrations on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration: group 1 (control) progesterone<3.34 nmol/l and oestradiol<19,124 pmol/l; group 2 (high oestradiol); group 3 (high progesterone); group 4 (high progesterone and high oestradiol). Compared with group 1, group 4 had lower clinical pregnancy and live birth rates as well as the highest ectopic pregnancy rate (29.15% versus 45.91%; 18.67% versus 34.34%; 18.10% versus 5.82%; P<0.05). Group 3 had lower clinical pregnancy and live birth rates per embryo-transfer cycle (29.78% versus 45.91%; 20.28% versus 34.34%, respectively; P<0.05). Clinical pregnancy rates were similar in frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FET) among the four groups. In conclusion, elevated progesterone was detrimental to live birth rates. High serum oestradiol concentration on HCG day did not affect the IVF pregnancy outcome. In combination with the elevated progesterone, high oestradiol concentrations had a potential negative effect. For these patients, FET should be suggested to improve the pregnancy outcomes. The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between serum progesterone/oestradiol concentrations and IVF pregnancy outcomes in gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocols. A total of 2921 infertile women undergoing IVF were assigned to four groups according to their serum progesterone and oestradiol concentrations on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration: group 1 (control) progesterone<3.34 nmol/l and oestradiol<19,124 pmol/l; group 2 (high oestradiol); group 3 (high progesterone); group 4 (high progesterone and high oestradiol). Compared with group 1, patients in group 4 had lower clinical pregnancy (29.15% versus 45.91%) and live birth rates (18.67% versus 34.34%) as well as the highest ectopic pregnancy rate (18.1% versus 5.82%) (all P<0.05). Those in group 3 had lower clinical pregnancy and live birth rates per embryo transfer cycle (29.78% versus 45.91%; 20.28% versus 34.34%, respectively, P<0.05). Embryo quality appeared to be unaffected since similar clinical pregnancy rates in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles among the four groups. In conclusion, elevated progesterone was detrimental to live birth rates. A high serum oestradiol concentration on the day of HCG administration did not affect the IVF pregnancy outcome. In combination with the elevated progesterone and oestradiol concentrations had a potential negative effect. For these patients, FET should be suggested to improve the pregnancy outcomes.

This study analyzed the clinical outcomes of patients with elevated progesterone level on the HCG day in IVF/ICSI cycles, with different timing of embryo transfer. A total of 123 patients were involved in this prospective randomized clinical study. Group 1: blastocyst transfer group, 38 cases; Group 2: frozen-thawed embryo transfer group (first FET cycle), 42 cases; Group 3: fresh embryo transfer group, 43 cases. The basal FSH level was comparable among three groups (6.7 ± 3 versus 7.0 ± 2 versus 6.9 ± 2.4, p = 0.897). The clinical pregnancy rate was highest in group 2, lowest in group 3, with significantly difference (31.6% versus 38.1% versus 13.9%, p = 0.037). The implantation rate and live birth rate were still lowest in group 3 (21.9% versus 19.8% versus 6.7%, p = 0.016 and 18.4% versus 31% versus 11.6%, p = 0.081). In conclusion, the elevated progesterone level will affect clinical pregnancy rate in fresh embryo transfer cycles. We suggest frozen-thawed embryo transfer for these patients. However, for those patients who expressed the wish to have fresh embryo transfer, they should be suggested fresh blastocyst transfer, if they have more than five good quality embryos.

No abstract

BP and SA in first IVF cycles had negative predictive value for subsequent ART outcomes.

Objective. To analyze the treatment outcomes of patients who accepted IVF/ICSI-ET, diagnosed POR according to Bologna criteria. Study Design. Retrospective cohort study of one reproductive medical center, from 1st Jan., 2009, to 31st Dec., 2014. All patients fulfilled the Bologna criteria and accept IVF/ICSI-ET treatment with stimulation cycle. The main outcome measures were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR). Results. There were 5770 eligible cycles included in this study. The incidence of POR was 10.3% (6286/62194). The overall CPR was 18.7%, IR was 11.6%, LBR/ET was 11.5%, and LBR/OPU was 8.3%. The cycle cancellation for no available oocyte or embryo was 4.9% and 18.6%, respectively. The subgroup of younger POR patients got highest CPR and LBR/ET, which decreased while increasing maternal age. Within three attempts, the patients got similar CPR and LBR. Conclusion. In conclusion, our study supports the Bologna criteria that defined women with poor IVF outcomes. But those younger than 42 years old with the first 3 attempts of IVF could got acceptable CPR and LBR.