In many existing high-rise multi-family buildings, a pressurized corridor ventilation system is used to meet outdoor air ventilation requirements. However, this system often has poor performance, leading to under- or over- ventilation in different parts of a building. This study examines three ventilation strategies including: the base case, which is a traditional pressurized corridor ventilation system, a direct-to-suite ducted ventilation system, and a suite-based HRV ventilation system. A building model was constructed in CONTAM using features of a typical post-war multi-family building in Toronto, Canada. All three strategies were simulated using CONTAM under both summer and winter conditions. The resulting outdoor airflow delivery rates to the suites and corridor pressure differentials were compared to assess the effectiveness of each strategy. The results show that the suite-based HRV strategy is able to provide adequate ventilation airflow to individual suites in both summer and winter. In the traditional pressurized corridor system and the direct-to-suite ducting system, the airflows delivered to the suites located at the top of the building are higher than those delivered to the suites located at the bottom of the building. This uneven airflow distribution is more pronounced in winter when stack effect impacts the ventilation system more significantly.

No abstract