Objective: Mid-thoracic spinal tuberculosis is prone to kyphotic deformities and neurologic impairment. Posterior approach can effectively restore the spinal stability by reconstructing the anterior and middle spinal columns. Titanium mesh cages (TMC), allogeneic bone (ALB), and autogenous bone (AUB) are three main bone graft struts. We aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy of three bone graft struts, for anterior and middle column reconstruction through a posterior approach in cases of mid-thoracic spinal tuberculosis.Methods: Hundred and thirty seven patients with thoracic spinal tuberculosis who had undergone a posterior approach from June 2010 to December 2018 were enrolled. Of them, 46 patients were treated using a titanium mesh cage (TMC group), 44 with allogenic bone grafts (ALB group), and 47 using autogenous bone grafts (AUB group). The following were analyzed to evaluate clinical efficacy: visual analogue scale (VAS) values, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, kyphotic Cobb's angle, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, improvement in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade and in the mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS) of Short Form-36 (SF-36), duration of bone graft fusion. The data of the three groups were compared by way of variance analysis, followed by the LSD•t test to compare each group. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the dates of pre-, postoperative and final follow-up. Results:The follow-up duration was at least 3 years. All patients achieved a complete cure for spinal TB. Neurological performance and quality of life were remarkably improved at the final follow-up. The intraoperative blood loss, operation time and VAS values 1 day postoperatively for TMC group and ALB group were significantly lower than those in AUB group (P < 0.05). The duration of bone graft fusion in ALB group (18.1 AE 3.7 months) was longer than that in TMC group and AUB group (9.5 AE 2.8 and 9.2 AE 1.9 months) (P < 0.05). No significant intergroup differences were observed in terms of age or preoperative, 3-months postoperative, and final follow-up indices of ESR and CRP among the three groups (P > 0.05). At the final follow-up, the correction loss was mild (2.1 AE 0.9, 2.2 AE 1.0, 2.1 AE 0.8) and Cobb's angles of the three groups were 20.1 AE 2.9, 20.5 AE 3.2, 20.9 AE 3.4, respectively, which were remarkably rectified in comparison with the preoperative measurements (P < 0.05). Conclusions:In terms of postoperative recovery and successful fusion rate of bone graft, it seems that posterior instrumentation, debridement, and interbody fusion with titanium mesh cages are more effective and appropriate surgical methods for mid-thoracic spinal tuberculosis.
Background: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the mid- to long-term outcomes of surgical management of lumbosacral junction tuberculosis in adults. Methods: A total of 38 adult patients were treated by one-stage posterior debridement, interbody fusion, lumbosacral or lumbopelvic fixation, and postural drainage. All cases were followed up for at least five years. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were gathered and analyzed.Results: All patients achieved clinical cure at the last follow-up. Erythrocyte sedimentation rates decreased to normal levels within three months postoperatively. Postoperative scores measuring pain (visual analog scale), neurological status (Japanese Orthopedic Association score), and patient quality of life (Oswestry Disability Index) all significantly improved compared to preoperative values. Patient-reported outcomes as measured by Kirkaldy-Willis criteria were excellent in 21 cases, good in 16 cases, and fair in 1 case; there were no poor outcomes. Lumbosacral angle increased from the preoperative values of 21.7° ± 1.8° to the postoperative values of 26.4° ± 1.4°, with an angle loss of 1.2° ± 0.7° at the last follow-up. Bone fusion occurred on average 12.8 ± 1.9 months after surgery. No nonunion, pseudarthrosis, loosening or fracture of instruments occurred at the last follow-up.Conclusion: For patients with lumbosacral junction TB, a treatment protocol including one-stage posterior debridement, interbody fusion, lumbosacral or lumbopelvic fixation, and postural drainage according to the severity of sacral destruction is a relatively nontraumatic and highly safe procedure. It can be used to reconstruct lumbosacral or lumbopelvic stability and facilitate the healing of TB.
Background This retrospective study aimed to perform comparatively evaluate the mid- to long-term efficacy of long-segment and short-segment fixations via the posterior approach as treatment for tuberculous spondylodiscitis in the mid-thoracic spine. Methods A total of 95 patients with tuberculous spondylodiscitis in the mid-thoracic spine underwent surgery via the posterior approach including single-stage posterior debridement, interbody fusion, and pedicle screw fixation. Long-segment fixations were performed for 46 patients (group A), while short-segment fixations were performed for the other 49 patients (group B). Clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed during mid- to long-term follow-up. Results The average follow-up periods for groups A and B were 75.5 ± 11.8 and 76.8 ± 11.6 months, respectively. The operative time and intraoperative blood loss were lower in group B than in group A (P < 0.05). Both management approaches significantly corrected the kyphotic deformity detected either in the early postoperative period or at the final visit after long-term follow-up (P > 0.05). Bony fusion was generated after average periods of 10.8 ± 2.1 months and 11.0 ± 2.0 months in groups A and B, respectively. Favorable outcomes were observed on assessment of neurological function and patients’ well-being at the final follow-up. Conclusion No therapeutic differences were observed between long-segment and short-segment fixation as surgical treatment for mid-thoracic Pott’s disease during mid- to long-term follow-up. Kyphotic deformity and neurological impairment were significantly relieved via both posterior fixation approaches, with patients’ well-being reaching a favorable level. Moreover, short-segment fixation led to less blood loss and required a shorter operative time.
Background: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the mid- to long-term outcomes of surgical management of lumbosacral junction tuberculosis in adults. Methods: A total of 38 adult patients were treated by one-stage posterior debridement, interbody fusion, lumbosacral or lumbopelvic fixation, and postural drainage. All cases were followed up for at least five years. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were gathered and analyzed.Results: All patients achieved clinical cure at the last follow-up. Erythrocyte sedimentation rates decreased to normal levels within three months postoperatively. Postoperative scores measuring pain (visual analog scale), neurological status (Japanese Orthopedic Association score), and patient quality of life (Oswestry Disability Index) all significantly improved compared to preoperative values. Patient-reported outcomes as measured by Kirkaldy-Willis criteria were excellent in 21 cases, good in 16 cases, and fair in 1 case; there were no poor outcomes. Lumbosacral angle increased from the preoperative values of 21.7° ± 1.8° to the postoperative values of 26.4° ± 1.4°, with an angle loss of 1.2° ± 0.7° at the last follow-up. Bone fusion occurred on average 12.8 ± 1.9 months after surgery. No nonunion, pseudarthrosis, loosening or fracture of instruments occurred at the last follow-up.Conclusion: For patients with lumbosacral junction TB, a treatment protocol including one-stage posterior debridement, interbody fusion, lumbosacral or lumbopelvic fixation, and postural drainage according to the severity of sacral destruction is a relatively nontraumatic and highly safe procedure. It can be used to reconstruct lumbosacral or lumbopelvic stability and facilitate the healing of TB.
Background: To explore the therapeutic effect of early surgical interventions for patients of active thoracic spinal tuberculosis (TB) with paraparesis and paraplegia.Methods: Data of 118 patients with active thoracic spinal TB and paraparesis and paraplegia who had undergone surgeries at an early stage (within three weeks of paraparesis and paraplegia) from January 2008 to December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The operation duration, blood loss, perioperative complication rate, VAS score, ASIA grade of neurological status, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), kyphotic Cobb’s angle, and duration of bone graft fusion were analyzed to evaluate the therapeutic effects.Results: Mean operation time was 194.2 minutes, mean blood loss was 871.2 ml. The perioperative complication rate was 5.1%. Mean preoperative VAS score was 5.3, significantly decreased to 3.2 after operation, and continued decreasing to 1.1 at the follow up (P<0.05). All cases achieved at least one grade elevation after operation, specifically, 2 cases of ASIA grade A rose to grade B, 10 cases of ASIA grade A rose to grade C, 2 cases of ASIA grade A rose to grade E; 9 cases of ASIA grade B rose to grade D, 38 cases of ASIA grade B rose to grade E; all 57 cases of ASIA grade C rose to ASIA grade E. The rate of full neurological recovery for patients with paraplegia was 14.3%, significantly lower than the rate (91.3%) for patients with paraparesis. Mean preoperative ESR and CRP were 73.1 mm /h and 82.4 mg/L, insignificantly increased after operation (P>0.05), then gradually decreased to 11.5 ± 1.8 mm /h and 2.6 ± 0.82 mg/L at the final follow up, respectively (P<0.05). The mean preoperative kyphotic Cobb’s angle was 21.9º, significantly decreased to 6.5º after operation (P<0.05) and the kyphotic correction had not lost during the follow up (P>0.05). Mean duration of bone graft fusion was 8.6±1.3 monthsConclusion: Early surgical intervention may be beneficial for patients with active thoracic spinal TB and paraparesis or paraplegia, with surgical intervention being more beneficial for paraparesis recovery compared with paraplegia recovery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.