No abstract

This study investigated the relationship among meat texture (Warner-Bratzler shear force [WBSF] and texture profile analysis [TPA]), water-holding capacity, and subsequent mastication of meat from sheep fed different diets and maintained under different packaging methods. Biceps femoris from 24 Merino sheep fed a standard pelleted diet containing grain and cereal hay or pelleted diets supplemented with either 8% camelina meal or 15% camelina forage hay was packaged in high-oxygen modified atmosphere packaging (hiOxMAP) or vacuum skin packaging (VSP). WBSF, TPA, and water-holding capacity (purge loss and cooking loss) were measured.Twelve volunteers were recruited to chew the cooked meat samples before expectorating the bolus at their natural swallowing point. Meat stored in hiOxMAP had greater purge loss, Warner-Bratzler peak force, hardness, and chewiness compared to meat packed in VSP. Mastication testing revealed that chewing frequency increased with VSP meat compared to hiOxMAP meat. Feed type had little effect on meat texture parameters; however, sheep meat on the standard pelleted diet required a greater number of chews than sheep finished on diet supplemented with camelina meal. Increased toughness in cooked meat due to feed type or packaging methods resulted in greater chewing effort, but this did not affect meat bolus properties at the natural swallowing point.

Connective tissue is considered to influence the toughness of pork, but most studies on connective tissue focus on the loin muscle. Cooking loss, Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF), texture profile analysis (hardness, springiness, chewiness, resilience and cohesiveness), total and insoluble collagen content, the percentage of type III collagen relative to the total of type I and III collagen, proteoglycan content and intramuscular fat (IMF) content were measured for pork Biceps femoris (BF) and Longissimus thoracis et lumborum (LTL) and Pearson’s correlation was performed. The results showed that BF had higher WBSF, resilience, total and insoluble collagen content than LTL (P<0.05). When considering both muscles, total and insoluble collagen content were positively correlated (P<0.05) with WBSF (r = 0.47 and 0.49, respectively), hardness (r = 0.49 and 0.50, respectively), cohesiveness (r = 0.50 and 0.50, respectively), chewiness (r = 0.58 and 0.59, respectively) and resilience (r = 0.63 and 0.63, respectively). The percentage of type III collagen content was negatively correlated (P<0.05) with WBSF (r = -0.68) and hardness (r = -0.58). Collagen content was correlated (P<0.05) with WBSF (r = 0.75) and hardness (r = 0.61) in LTL and with cohesiveness and resilience in BF. Collagen characteristics differ between muscles and contribute to pork texture in both LTL and BF.