Individual structural parameters of trees, such as forest stand tree height and biomass, serve as the foundation for monitoring of dynamic changes in forest resources. Individual tree structural parameters are closely related to individual tree crown segmentation. Although three-dimensional (3D) data have been successfully used to determine individual tree crown segmentation, this phenomenon is influenced by various factors, such as the (i) source of 3D data, (ii) the segmentation algorithm, and (iii) the tree species. To further quantify the effect of various factors on individual tree crown segmentation, light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data and image-derived points were obtained by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Three different segmentation algorithms (PointNet++, Li2012, and layer-stacking segmentation (LSS)) were used to segment individual tree crowns for four different tree species. The results show that for two 3D data, the crown segmentation accuracy of LiDAR data was generally better than that obtained using image-derived 3D data, with a maximum difference of 0.13 in F values. For the three segmentation algorithms, the individual tree crown segmentation accuracy of the PointNet++ algorithm was the best, with an F value of 0.91, whereas the result of the LSS algorithm yields the worst result, with an F value of 0.86. Among the four tested tree species, the individual tree crown segmentation of Liriodendron chinense was the best, followed by Magnolia grandiflora and Osmanthus fragrans, whereas the individual tree crown segmentation of Ficus microcarpa was the worst. Similar crown segmentation of individual Liriodendron chinense and Magnolia grandiflora trees was observed based on LiDAR data and image-derived 3D data. The crown segmentation of individual Osmanthus fragrans and Ficus microcarpa trees was superior according to LiDAR data to that determined according to image-derived 3D data. These results demonstrate that the source of 3D data, the segmentation algorithm, and the tree species all have an impact on the crown segmentation of individual trees. The effect of the tree species is the greatest, followed by the segmentation algorithm, and the effect of the 3D data source. Consequently, in future research on individual tree crown segmentation, 3D data acquisition methods should be selected based on the tree species, and deep learning segmentation algorithms should be adopted to improve the crown segmentation of individual trees.
Landsat 9 enhances the radiation resolution of the operational land imager from the 12 bits of Landsat 8 to 14 bits. The higher radiation resolution improves the sensitivity of the sensor to detect many subtler differences, especially in the case of dense forests or water. However, it remains unclear whether the difference in radiation resolution between Landsat 8 and Landsat 9 actually affects the classification results of water and tree species. Accordingly, the spectral reflectance and vegetation indices were extracted in this study, based on Landsat 8 and Landsat 9 images. Then, the classification models of land use and land cover (LULC) and tree species were developed by using a gradient tree boosting algorithm. Subsequently, the results were analyzed to further investigate how the differences in radiation resolution affect the classification results of LULC and tree species. It is shown that the LULC classification results of Landsat 8 and Landsat 9 are relatively favorable in most cases. However, the LULC classification results are relatively poor in test areas with a lower classification accuracy of water. Further analysis, in the case of test areas with poor classification results, indicates that there are significant differences in the water classification results between the two datasets. In other words, Landsat 9 produces better water classification results than Landsat 8 in most test areas. However, a temperature close to zero may lead to inverse water classification results. In addition, it indicates that the difference in forest classification results between the two datasets is small, but the results of forest tree species classification based on Landsat 9 are superior to those based on Landsat 8, with an improvement in overall accuracy of 6.01%. The results demonstrate that the difference in radiation resolution between Landsat 8 and Landsat 9 has little impact on the results of LULC classification in most cases. Nevertheless, in the case of some test areas, Landsat 9 is better suited for enhancing the classification accuracy of water and tree species.
Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) points and high-resolution RGB image-derived points have been successfully used to extract tree structural parameters. However, the differences in extracting individual tree structural parameters among different tree species have not been systematically studied. In this study, LiDAR data and images were collected using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to explore the differences in digital elevation model (DEM) and digital surface models (DSM) generation and tree structural parameter extraction for different tree species. It was found that the DEMs generated based on both forms of data, LiDAR and image, exhibited high correlations with the field-measured elevation, with an R2 of 0.97 and 0.95, and an RMSE of 0.24 and 0.28 m, respectively. In addition, the differences between the DSMs are small in non-vegetation areas, whereas the differences are relatively large in vegetation areas. The extraction results of individual tree crown width and height based on two kinds of data are similar when all tree species are considered. However, for different tree species, the Cinnamomum camphora exhibits the greatest accuracy in terms of crown width extraction, with an R2 of 0.94 and 0.90, and an RMSE of 0.77 and 0.70 m for LiDAR and image points, respectively. In comparison, for tree height extraction, the Magnolia grandiflora exhibits the highest accuracy, with an R2 of 0.89 and 0.90, and an RMSE of 0.57 and 0.55 m for LiDAR and image points, respectively. The results indicate that both LiDAR and image points can generate an accurate DEM and DSM. The differences in the DEMs and DSMs between the two data types are relatively large in vegetation areas, while they are small in non-vegetation areas. There are significant differences in the extraction results of tree height and crown width between the two data sets among different tree species. The results will provide technical guidance for low-cost forest resource investigation and monitoring.
The assessment of changes in the height growth of trees can serve as an accurate basis for the simulation of various ecological processes. However, most studies conducted on changes in the height growth of trees are on an annual scale. This makes it difficult to obtain basic data for correcting time differences in the height growth estimates of trees within a year. In this study, the digital elevation models (DEMs) were produced based on stereo images and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data obtained by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Individual tree crowns were segmented by employing the watershed segmentation algorithm and the maximum value within each crown was extracted as the height of each tree. Subsequently, the height growth of each tree on a monthly-scale time series was extracted to simulate the time difference correction of regional tree height estimates within a year. This was used to verify the feasibility of the time difference correction method on a monthly scale. It is evident from the results that the DEM based on UAV stereo images was closely related to the DEM based on UAV LiDAR, with correlation coefficients of R2 = 0.96 and RMSE = 0.28 m. There was a close correlation between the tree height extracted from canopy height models (CHMs) based on UAV images and the measured tree height, with correlation coefficients of R2 = 0.99, and RMSE = 0.36 m. Regardless of the tree species, the total height growth in each month throughout the year was 46.53 cm. The most significant changes in the height growth of trees occurred in May (14.26 cm) and June (14.67 cm). In the case of the Liriodendron chinense tree species, the annual height growth was the highest (58.64 cm) while that of the Osmanthus fragrans tree species was the lowest (34.00 cm). By analyzing the height growth estimates of trees each month, it was concluded that there were significant differences among various tree species. In the case of the Liriodendron chinense tree species, the growth season occurred primarily from April to July. During this season, 56.92 cm of growth was recorded, which accounted for 97.08% of the annual growth. In the case of the Ficus concinna tree species, the tree height was in a state of growth during each month of the year. The changes in the height growth estimates of the tree were higher from May to August (44.24 cm of growth, accounting for 77.09% of the annual growth). After applying the time difference correction to the regional tree growth estimates, the extraction results of the changes in the height growth estimates of the tree (based on a monthly scale) were correlated with the height of the UAV image-derived tree. The correlation coefficients of R2 = 0.99 and RMSE = 0.26 m were obtained. The results demonstrate that changes in the height growth estimates on a monthly scale can be accurately determined by employing UAV stereo images. Furthermore, the results can provide basic data for the correction of the time differences in the growth of regional trees and further provide technical and methodological guidance for regional time difference correction of other forest structure parameters.
A majority of mangroves are located in the coastal intertidal zone and are subject to tidal periodic inundation. However, the previous vegetation indices used for extracting the spatial distribution of mangroves were not able to effectively extract submerged mangroves, and the applicability of the vegetation indices used on different spatial resolution images obtained from different sensors was not verified. In this study, a new vegetation index, namely the intertidal mangrove identification indices (IMIIs), was proposed, based on GF-2 images of high and low tide levels. Meanwhile, other commonly used vegetation indices were also extracted. All the vegetation indices were used to extract the spatial distribution of mangroves under tidal inundation, and applicability tests of the vegetation indices were conducted on Sentinel-2 images in three different regions. It was found that the IMIIs proposed based on GF-2 images of high and low tide levels can extract submerged mangroves relatively well, and the spatial distribution extraction results of mangroves are better than those of other vegetation indices, with IMII2 outperforming IMII1. At the same time, IMIIs have good applicability in medium resolution Sentinel-2 images, and there are relatively large differences in the extraction results of mangrove spatial distribution among different vegetation indices in areas with significant impact of tidal inundation. Among all vegetation indices, the extraction results of IMIIs are relatively superior. In most cases, multi variables collaborative application can improve the accuracy of mangrove spatial distribution extraction results. Based on the results of this study, it was concluded that the IMIIs proposed in this study can accurately extract the spatial distribution of mangroves inundated by tides from both medium- and high-resolution images, providing accurate basic data for effective management and scientific protection of mangrove resources.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.