Background
Multistate foodborne disease outbreaks and recalls of apples and apple products contaminated with
Listeria monocytogenes
demonstrate the need for improved pathogen control in the apple supply chain. Apple processing facilities have been identified in the past as potential sources of persisting
L
.
monocytogenes
contamination. In this study, we sought to understand the composition of microbiota in built apple and other tree fruit processing environments and its association with the occurrence of the foodborne pathogen
L
.
monocytogenes
.
Results
Analysis of 117 samples collected from three apple and other tree fruit packing facilities (F1, F2, and F3) showed that facility F2 had a significantly higher
L
.
monocytogenes
occurrence compared to F1 and F3 (
p
< 0.01). The microbiota in facility F2 was distinct compared to facilities F1 and F3 as supported by the mean Shannon index for bacterial and fungal alpha diversities that was significantly lower in F2, compared to F1 and F3 (
p
< 0.01). Microbiota in F2 was uniquely predominated by bacterial family Pseudomonadaceae and fungal family Dipodascaceae.
Conclusions
The composition and diversity of microbiota and mycobiota present in the investigated built food processing environments may be indicative of persistent contamination with
L
.
monocytogenes
. These findings support the need for further investigation of the role of the microbial communities in the persistence of
L
.
monocytogenes
to support the optimization of
L
.
monocytogenes
control strategies in the apple supply chain.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1186/s40168-019-0726-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.