Background Esophageal cancer is one of globally high incidence and mortality disease. Its early stage has rarely obvious symptoms. Compared to conventional endoscopy diagnosis, liquid biopsy is an emerging non-invasive method for cancer early detection. Methods We enrolled 100 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients and 71 healthy individuals as a Southern China cohort and performed 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) sequencing on their plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA). A Northern cohort of cfDNA 5hmC dataset with 150 ESCC patients and 183 health individuals were downloaded for validation. A diagnostic model was firstly developed based on cfDNA 5hmC signatures and then improved by low-pass whole genome sequencing (WGS) features of cfDNA. Results Conserved cfDNA 5hmC modification motifs were observed in the two independent ESCC cohorts. A diagnostic model with 273 5hmC features based on randomly-selected two-thirds samples of the Southern China cohort was validated independently in the left one-thirds samples and the whole Northern China cohort, achieved an AUC of 0.810 and 0.862 with sensitivities of 69.3–74.3% and specificities of 82.4–90.7%, respectively. The performance was well maintained in Stage I to Stage IV, with accuracy of 70%-100%, but low in Stage 0, with accuracy of 33.3%. Low-pass WGS of cfDNA improved the AUC to 0.934 with a sensitivity of 82.4%, a specificity of 88.2% and an accuracy of 84.3%, particularly significantly in Stage 0 with the accuracy up to 80%. Conclusions This study suggests that the blood-based 5hmC integrated with low-pass WGS model could improve the accurate diagnosis of early stage ESCC, particularly for very early stage ESCC.
Background. The aim of this study was to identify novel biomarkers associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) prognosis. Methods. 81 ESCC samples collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were used as the training set, and 179 ESCC samples collected from the Gene Expression Omnibus database (GEO) were used as the validation set. The protein-coding genes of 25 samples from patients who completed the follow-up in TCGA were analyzed to construct a coexpression network by weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA). Gene ontology (GO) terms and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways analyses were performed for the selected genes. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression model was constructed to analyze survival-related genes, and an optimal prognostic model was developed as well as evaluated by Kaplan–Meier and ROC curves. Results. In this study, a module containing 43 protein-coding genes and strongly related to overall survival (OS) was identified through WGCNA. These genes were significantly enriched in retina homeostasis, antimicrobial humoral response, and epithelial cell differentiation. Besides, through the LASSO regression model, 3 genes (PDLIM2, DNASE1L3, and KRT81) significantly related to ESCC survival were screened and an optimal prognostic 3-gene risk prediction model was constructed. ESCC patients with low and high OS in both sets could be successfully discriminated by calculating a risk score with the linear combination of the expression level of each gene multiplied by the LASSO coefficient. Conclusions. Our study identified three novel biomarkers that have potential in the prognosis prediction of ESCC.
Introduction: The standards of esophagus segmentation remain different between the Japan Esophageal Society (JES) guideline and the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) guideline. This study aimed to present variations in the location of intrathoracic esophageal adjacent anatomical landmarks (EAALs) and determine an appropriate method for segmenting the thoracic esophagus based on the relatively fixed EAALs.Patients and Methods: The distances from the upper incisors to the upper border of the esophageal hiatus, lower border of the inferior pulmonary vein (LPV), tracheal bifurcation, lower border of the azygous vein (LAV), and thoracic inlet were measured in the patients undergoing thoracic surgery. The median distances between the EAALs and the specified starting points, as well as reference value ranges and ratios, were obtained. The variation coefficients of distances and ratios from certain starting points to different EAALs were calculated and compared to determine the relatively fixed landmarks.Results: This study included 305 patients. The average distance from the upper incisors to the upper border of the cardia, the midpoint between the tracheal bifurcation and esophageal hiatus (MTBEH), LPV, LAV, tracheal bifurcation, and thoracic inlet were 41.6, 35.3, 34.8, 29.4, 29.5, and 20.3 cm, respectively. The distances from the upper incisors or thoracic inlet to any intrathoracic EAALs in men were higher than in women. In addition, the height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were correlated with the distances. The ratio of the distance between the upper incisors and tracheal bifurcation to the distance between the upper incisors and upper border of the cardia and the ratio of the distance between the thoracic inlet and tracheal bifurcation to the distance between the thoracic inlet and upper border of the cardia possessed relatively smaller coefficients of variation.Conclusion: The distances from the EAALs to the upper incisors vary with height, weight, BMI, and gender. Compared with distance, the ratios are more suitable for esophagus segmentation. Tracheal bifurcation and MTBEH are ideal EAALs for thoracic esophagus segmentation, and this is consistent with the JES guideline recommendation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.