AimTo evaluate the clinical value of serum high mobility group box chromosomal protein 1 (HMGB1) levels in making the early diagnosis of recurrent cervical squamous cell carcinomas (CSCC) and compare it with the value of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA), cytokeratin fragment (CYFRA) 21-1, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels.Methods Immunohistochemical staining of tissue from 64 patients with recurrent CSCCs, 72 patients with non-recurrent carcinoma, and 28 healthy participants was performed to determine the expression of HMGB1 protein. The serum levels of the 4 markers in 112 patients with recurrent CSCC, 174 patients with non-recurrent disease, and 128 healthy participants were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. ResultsHigher immunostaining score was found in recurrent CSCC tissue sections than in non-recurrent CSCC sections. Serum HMGB1 levels in patients with recurrent CSCC were significantly higher than in patients with non-recurrent disease and healthy controls. The AUC of HMGB1, SCCA, CY-FRA21-1, and CEA was 0.816, 0.768, 0.703, and 0.625, respectively. HMGB1 had the best specificity and positive likelihood ratio (78.0% and 3.25, respectively), whereas SCCA had the best sensitivity and negative likelihood ratio (76.3% and 0.34, respectively). Parallel combined measurements increased the diagnostic sensitivity and serial combination increased the specificity. High serum HMGB1 levels were inversely correlated with disease-free survival (P = 0.009, Pearson χ 2 test) and overall survival (P = 0.018).Conclusion HMGB1 was overexpressed in recurrent CSCCs. Serum HMGB1 level could be a useful and specific marker for evaluating the disease recurrence and predicting prognosis in patients with CSCC. Serial combined measurements of serum HMGB1, SCCA, and CYFRA21-1 increased the diagnostic specificity, and parallel combined testing increased the diagnostic sensitivity.

We aimed to compare the efficacy of paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel–carboplatin for treating advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in this retrospective, STROBE-compliant study. Patients’ tolerance to treatment was also assessed.We retrospectively analyzed the records of 178 women who underwent initial optimal debulking surgery between January 2003 and December 2011 to treat FIGO stage IIIc epithelial ovarian cancer. Patients in arm 1 (n = 88) received 4 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by 2 to 4 cycles of gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy. Patients in arm 2 (n = 90) received 6 to 8 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin. The granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was administered prophylactically to all patients.The median follow-up for both arms was 62 months. Medianprogression-free survival (PFS) between arms 1 and 2 (28 and 19 months [P = 0.003]) as well as 5-year OS (34.1% and 18.9% [P = 0.021]) differed significantly. The neurotoxicity rate was significantly higher in arm 2 than in arm 1 (45.2% vs 27.1%, P = 0.026). There was no significant difference between study arms in hematological toxicity.The sequential regimen significantly improved PFS and 5-year OS with tolerable toxicity compared with the single regimen, and offers an alternative for treating patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.