Objectives: To investigate the clinical effect of mild hypothermia combined with intravenous thrombolysis in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction. Methods: Eighty-eight patients with acute cerebral infarction in Binzhou People’s Hospital between May 2018 and August 2019 were randomly selected and divided into a control group and an observation group according to the random number table method, with 44 patients in each group. The control group was given intravenous thrombolysis; the observation group was treated with mild hypothermia (30-350C) in addition to intravenous thrombolytic thrombolysis. The clinical efficacy, incidence of complications, oxidative stress indexes, inflammatory factor level, neurological function, and mental state of the two groups before and after treatment were compared. Results: The clinical efficacy of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the levels of oxidative stress indexes and inflammatory factors between the two groups before treatment (P<0.05). After treatment, the levels of oxidative stress indexes and inflammatory factors of the two groups significantly improved, and the improvement of the observation group was better than that of the control group; the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the neurological function and mental state between the two groups before treatment (P<0.05). After treatment, the neurological function and mental state of the two groups significantly improved, and the improvement of the observation group was better than that of the control group; the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications and mortality between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Thrombolytic therapy combined with mild hypothermia has a good efficacy in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction. The therapy can improve the neurological function of patients with acute cerebral infarction by significantly improving the oxidative stress index and relieving the inflammatory reaction. Its efficacy is better than single thrombolytic therapy. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.7.4499 How to cite this:Zhang S, Gao L, Wo X, Wang Z. Clinical observation of mild hypothermia combined with intravenous thrombolysis in treating patients with acute cerebral infarction. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(7):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.7.4499 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of sequential butylphthalide therapy combined with dual antiplatelet therapy in the treatment of elderly patients with acute cerebral infarction (ACI). Methods: One hundred and twenty-two elderly patients with ACI who were admitted to the department of neurology of our hospital at May 2016-August 2018 were selected grouped into a control group and an observation group by random number table method, 61 in each group. On the basis of conventional treatment, the patients in the control group were given dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin enteric-coated tablets + clopidogrel bisulfate tablets), while the patients in the observation group were given sequential butylphthalide therapy on the basis of the control group. The clinical effects of the two groups were compared after four weeks of treatment, and the changes of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), ADL score, plasma 3-mercaptopyruvate sulphurtransferase (3-MST) and Amyloid β42 (Aβ42) levels and the occurrence of adverse reactions during treatment were recorded. Results: The clinical efficacy of the observation group was better than that of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in NIHSS and ADL scores between the two groups before treatment (P>0.05). After treatment, the NIHSS and ADL scores of the observation group were better than those of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in plasma levels of 3-MST and AB42 between the two groups before treatment (P>0.05). The level of plasma 3-MST in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the level of plasma Aβ42 was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). No serious adverse reactions occurred during the treatment period in both groups. Conclusion: Butylphthalide sequential therapy combined with dual antiplatelet therapy is effective in the treatment of elderly ACI. It can effectively improve the plasma level of 3-MST and decrease the plasma level of Aβ42, which is conducive to improving the living ability and neurological function of patients and has high safety. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.4.1831 How to cite this:Wo X, Han J, Wang J, Wang X, Liu X, Wang Z. Sequential butylphthalide therapy combined with dual antiplatelet therapy in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(4):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.4.1831 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase and intravenous thrombolysis with urokinase for patients with acute cerebral infarction. Methods: This prospective study included 140 patients with acute cerebral infarction who were admitted to our hospital between June 2018 and June 2019. They were randomly divided into two groups. The control group (70 cases) was treated with urokinase intravenous thrombolysis, and the observation group (70 cases) was given alteplase intravenous thrombolytic therapy. The treatment efficacy and safety of the two groups were compared. Results: The total effective rate of the observation group was 95.7%, and that of the control group was 78.6%, i.e., the total effective rate of the observation group was significantly superior to the that of the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the observation group had significantly lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score and significantly higher mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score than the control group; the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). After treatment, the levels of inflammatory factors of both groups significantly decreased compared to before treatment, and the decrease in the observation group was larger than that in the control group (P<0.05). The levels of serum homocysteine (Hcy) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group after treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of hemorrhagic adverse reaction in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of acute cerebral infarction, ccompared with urokinase, alteplase can further relieve cognitive impairment and promote the recovery of nerve function through inhibiting levels of inflammatory factors and levels of serum Hcy and MCP-1. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.3.4521 How to cite this:Gao L, Zhang S, Wo X, Shen X, Tian Q, Wang G. Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction. Pak J Med Sci. 2022;38(3):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.3.4521 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.