Non-native plants are typically released from specialist enemies in new
ranges, but continue to be attacked by generalists, but whether they
shift relative allocation to constitutive or induced defenses is
unknown. We compared herbivory on co-occurring native and non-native
species and also constitutive and induced defenses. Non-natives suffered
less damage than natives and constitutive defenses of non-natives was
lower than that of native congeners, whereas induced defense was the
opposite. The strength of constitutive defenses for a species was
correlated with the intensity of herbivory experienced, for non-natives,
whereas induced defenses showed the reverse. The defenses of natives
were not related to herbivory pressure. Finally, the strength of induced
defenses correlated positively with growth, suggesting a novel mechanism
for the evolution of increased competitive ability. These results expand
our understanding of fundamental tradeoffs in constitutive and induced
defenses and provide novel insight into how herbivory pressure affects
defense allocation.
Non‐native plants are typically released from specialist enemies but continue to be attacked by generalists, albeit at lower intensities. This reduced herbivory may lead to less investment in constitutive defences and greater investment in induced defences, potentially reducing defence costs. We compared herbivory on 27 non‐native and 59 native species in the field and conducted bioassays and chemical analyses on 12 pairs of non‐native and native congeners. Non‐natives suffered less damage and had weaker constitutive defences, but stronger induced defences than natives. For non‐natives, the strength of constitutive defences was correlated with the intensity of herbivory experienced, whereas induced defences showed the reverse. Investment in induced defences correlated positively with growth, suggesting a novel mechanism for the evolution of increased competitive ability. To our knowledge, these are the first linkages reported among trade‐offs in plant defences related to the intensity of herbivory, allocation to constitutive versus induced defences, and growth.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.