Little has been reported on the effects of long-term fertilization on rhizosphere soil microbial diversity. Here, we investigated the effects of long-term continuous nitrogen (N) fertilization on the diversity and composition of soil bacteria using data from a 10-year field experiment with five N application rates (0, 120, 180, 240, and 360 kg N hm −2). The results revealed varying degrees of reduction in the numbers of bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in response to the different N application rates. The highest wheat yield and number of proprietary bacterial OTUs were found in the N input of 180 kg N hm −2. In terms of average relative richness, the top seven phyla of soil bacteria in the rhizosphere of wheat after long-term nitrogen application were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, Bacteroidetes, Gemmatimonadetes, and Patescibacteria. Among these, Proteobacteria and Gemmatimonadetes were found to be unaffected by the nitrogen fertilizer and soil environmental factors (pH, C/N ratio, and NO 3 − concentration), whereas Acidobacteria and Actinobacteria showed significant positive and negative correlations, respectively, with soil pH. The richness of Actinobacteria significantly increased in the N 180 treatment. Patescibacteria and Bacteroidetes showed significant positive correlations with soil NO 3 − and wheat yield, and the average relative richness of these two phyla was high under long-term application of the N 180 treatment. These findings indicate that the relative richness of Patescibacteria and Bacteroidetes can affect wheat yield. In conclusion, the results of our 10-year field experiments clearly show that long-term N fertilization can significantly affect most of the dominant soil bacterial species via changing the soil pH. The richness of Actinobacteria can serve as an indicator of a decreased soil pH caused by long-term N fertilization.
Potassium (K) is a critical plant nutrient that determines quality in a myriad of crops and increases production yields. However, excessive application of various types of K fertilizers can decrease both the food quality and yields, which translates as economic losses and food safety issues. The objectives of this study were to 1) elucidate the impacts of different application rates of various K fertilizers on garlic, with the aim to identify the optimal and most economical K fertilizer dosage and 2) compare the effects of applying two common K fertilizers (KCl and K2SO4) on garlic, to determine the optimal combination. From 2018 to 2020, we utilized two distinct K-fertilized fields to conduct our experiments. The results revealed optimal KCl fertilization increased the biomass and vegetation index in garlic, and promoted the transfer of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium nutrients from the stem and leaf to bulb, thereby increasing bulb production. The application of KCl fertilizer increased the number of cloves, the diameters of the cloves and bulbs, and reduced variations in bulb size. In addition, the application of KCl fertilizer improved the nutritional quality (Vitamin C, soluble sugar, soluble protein, and allicin) of the garlic and reduced the accumulation of nitrate. However, excessive KCl fertilizer cause decreased yields, appearance traits, and nutritional quality. Applying the same rate of K fertilizer in the form of K2SO4 in isolation increased the garlic yield by only 0.1% to 22.5% when compared with KCl fertilizer. However, the results were not always significant. In this study, the highest yields, appearance traits, and nutritional quality were achieved with the ratio of K2SO4: KCl = 3:1. Consequently, to ensure the highest economic value (considering the market prices of K fertilizer, garlic sprouts, and bulbs), the authors recommend a K fertilizer rate of 252.5 kg·ha−1 K2O, with K2SO4 accounting for 61.6% for garlic production in field.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.