Beetle horns are attractive models for studying the evolution of novel traits, as they display diverse shapes, sizes, and numbers among closely related species within the family Scarabaeidae. Horns radiated prolifically and independently in two distant subfamilies of scarabs, the dung beetles (Scarabaeinae), and the rhinoceros beetles (Dynastinae). However, current knowledge of the mechanisms underlying horn diversification remains limited to a single genus of dung beetles, Onthophagus. Here we unveil 11 horn formation genes in a rhinoceros beetle, Trypoxylus dichotomus. These 11 genes are mostly categorized as larval head- and appendage-patterning genes that also are involved in Onthophagus horn formation, suggesting the same suite of genes was recruited in each lineage during horn evolution. Although our RNAi analyses reveal interesting differences in the functions of a few of these genes, the overwhelming conclusion is that both head and thoracic horns develop similarly in Trypoxylus and Onthophagus, originating in the same developmental regions and deploying similar portions of appendage patterning networks during their growth. Our findings highlight deep parallels in the development of rhinoceros and dung beetle horns, suggesting either that both horn types arose in the common ancestor of all scarabs, a surprising reconstruction of horn evolution that would mean the majority of scarab species (~35,000) actively repress horn growth, or that parallel origins of these extravagant structures resulted from repeated co-option of the same underlying developmental processes.

We have studied the possible involvement of nitric oxide (NO) in the contact hypersensitivity reaction. A biphasic response of ear swelling was observed at 2 h (early phase) and 24 h (late phase) after application of the antigen to picryl chloride (PC1)-sensitized CBA/J mice. Intravenous injection of NO synthase inhibitor, NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), at the time of PC1 challenge, inhibited in a concentration-dependent fashion the antigen-induced contact hypersensitivity reaction. Low-dose (1 mg/kg) L-NAME inhibited the early-phase reaction but not the late-phase reaction. High-dose (250 mg/kg) L-NAME inhibited both early- and late-phase reactions. D-NAME (enantiomer of L-NAME) did not inhibit the antigen-induced ear swelling. High-dose (250 mg/kg) L-arginine increased both early and late phase reactions. D-Arginine (enantiomer of L-arginine) did no increase the antigen-induced ear swelling. L-NAME injection, however, did not suppress phenol-induce irritant inflammation. Treatment of mice undergoing PC1-induced contact hypersensitivity reaction with L-NAME reduced the production of interleukin-2 and interferon-gamma by draining lymph node cells. Treatment with L-arginine, on the other hand increased the production of interleukin-2 and interferon-gamma. These results suggest that NO plays a modulating role in contact hypersensitivity reaction.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract