Sulphonylurea (SU) stimulates insulin secretion by pancreatic beta-cells and is generally used as a first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes. However, after long-term SU treatment (six months or over), some patients begin to show an increase in blood glucose once again (secondary SU failure). Two theories have been put forward to explain this failure--dysfunction of the proinsulin conversion machinery or insulin resistance. However, the primary pathogenesis behind secondary SU failure still needs to be investigated. Using a reliable technique that specifically identifies intact proinsulin (IPI), total proinsulin (TPI) and specific insulin (SI), this study aims to discover if a defect in the proinsulin converting mechanism plays a role in SU failure. Three groups were recruited for this study: healthy controls (n=8), SU responders (n=38) and secondary SU failures (n= 46). Serum concentrations of insulin-related molecules released in response to a standard glucose challenge test were compared between the groups. It was found that total SI was lower in the patient groups (P<0.05 compared to the control group), while TPI and IPI showed no distinct difference between the three groups (P>0.05). TPI:SI ratio and IPI:SI ratio showed marked increases in the patient groups (P<0.05 compared to control group), with no obvious quantitative difference between SU responders and secondary SU failures (P>0.05). Similar results for the Homa Insulin Resistant Index were found between the two patient groups. Interestingly, blood glucose at 180 mins after glucose challenge was significantly higher in the secondary SU failure group (P<0.05), with no correlation to SI, while the SU responder group showed good correlation between the parameters (P<0.05). We conclude that type 2 diabetes is associated with obvious dysfunction in the proinsulin-converting process and shows severe SI deficiency in responding to glucose challenge. Dysfunction of the proinsulin conversion mechanism was not an extra cause responsible for SU failure.
Progressive deterioration of beta-cell function is proposed as a disease-related factor of sulphonylurea (SU) failure in type 2 diabetes. If it gradually worsens over time then disease duration may mirror the progressive beta-cell deterioration. The aim of the present study is to assess whether or not disease duration is influential in remodelling the secretion pattern of insulin-like molecules and in glucose control of SU-treated type 2 diabetes. A research model is used to investigate proinsulin secreting capacity over time, using two groups of patients: i) disease duration <5 years (n=62), comprising SU responders (SUr; n=48) and SU failures (SUf; n=14); and ii) disease duration > or = 5 years (n= 37), comprising an SUr group (n=17) and an SUf group (n=20). Blood samples are taken at 0 h, 0.5 h 1 h, 2 h and 3 h during a standard oral glucose tolerance test and measured for glucose, total proinsulin (TPI), intact proinsulin (IPI) and specific insulin (SI) concentrations. Pairwise comparison of estimated marginal means of blood glucose, SI, IPI and TPI levels at each time point are carried out between groups and subgroups. (SUr vs. SUf). Homa insulin resistance index (IR index) is applied to analyse IR between the groups. It was found that patients with shorter disease duration had higher proinsulin (TPI and IPI) levels at all time points (P<0.05), together with a lower glucose level at 2 h and 3 h (P<0.05). Homa insulin index analysis showed no difference between the two groups (P=0.26). Results also showed that the SUr group had a significantly lower glucose level at Oh and 3h (P<0.05), although no significant difference in insulin and proinsulin levels was found between the SUr and SUf groups. In conclusion, proinsulin may play an important role in glucose control in SU-treated type 2 diabetes, but the effect is reduced in SUf patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.