Background and Aims:The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is widely used in clinical practice as a part of the multimodal analgesic regimen after abdominal surgery. The analgesic efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided TAP block with the mid-axillary approach was investigated in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in a randomized controlled clinical trial.Materials and Methods:Adult patients (n = 119) undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery were randomized to undergo either TAP block with ropivacaine (Group A, n = 60) or that with saline (Group B, n = 59), in a blinded manner. Following general anesthesia, TAP block was performed bilaterally by infusion of either 20-mL 0.375% ropivacaine/one side in Group A or 20-mL saline/one side in Group B, under US guidance with a mid-axillary approach. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was performed postoperatively with tramadol. The analgesic effect was postoperatively evaluated using a four-grade pain score and the prince Henry pain scale (PHS) at 0, 6, 12, and 24 h. Postoperative tramadol PCA consumption and vomiting/nausea were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test or Fisher's exact probability test. A P < 0.05 was considered significant.Results:There was no statistically significant difference in background characteristics. The dose of remifentanil was significantly higher in Group B (P = 0.01). The pain score (P = 0.02) and PHS (P = 0.01) were significantly lower in Group A at 0 h. Tramadol PCA consumption in the period of 0-6 h (P = 0.01) and postoperative nausea (P = 0.04) were significantly less in Group A.Conclusion:Postoperative pain/nausea and PCA consumption were significantly lower in patients with TAP block in the early postoperative stage. TAP block with a mid-axillary approach holds considerable promise as a part of a balanced postoperative analgesic regimen following laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.
To evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) and rectus sheath (RS) blocks in pain management and recovery after gynecological single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). Materials and Methods: A bilateral TAP block (Group A, n=9), bilateral TAP and RS blocks (Group B, n=10), and a bilateral RS block (Group C, n=9) with 40 ml ropivacaine per patient were conducted in 28 patients undergoing SILS for ovarian tumors. A pain score and walking distance in a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) were examined. Results: Pain scores were significantly lower on postoperative day (POD) 3 than on POD 1 in Groups B (p = 0.03) and C (p = 0.02). The walking distance on POD 3 was comparable with that before surgery in Group C (p = 0.75), but shorter in Groups A (p = 0.004) and B (p = 0.02). Conclusions: The RS block alone was the most effective in relieving pain and accelerating general recovery after gynecological SILS.
To investigate the efficacy of the combination of ultrasound-guided rectus sheath (RS) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks compared with TAP or RS block alone in gynecological single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). Materials and Methods: Bilateral TAP blocks (Group A, n = 12), TAP and RS blocks (Group B, n = 12), and RS blocks (Group C, n = 12) with 40 ml ropivacaine/patient were performed for ovarian tumor SILS. The analgesic effects were evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS) at zero, six, 12, 24, and 48 hours post-surgery. Results: Umbilical pain on completion of general anesthesia was significantly less frequent in Group B (1/12) than Group A (7/12) (p = 0.03). The postoperative NRS scores were significantly lower in Group B than Group A at zero (p = 0.02) and six (p = 0.03) hours and Group C at zero (p = 0.001), six (p = 0.02), and 12 (p = 0.004) hours. Conclusion: The combination of RS and TAP blocks reduced early postoperative pain compared with RS or TAP block alone for gynecological SILS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.