BackgroundPrevious studies have shown that patients with a history of atrial fibrillation (AF) have a higher risk of developing coronary slow flow (CSF). However, whether AF episode status affects the incidence of CSF has not been confirmed. This study investigated the correlation between AF episode status and the incidence of CSF.MethodsWe enrolled patients with AF who underwent coronary angiography for symptoms of myocardial ischemia between January 1, 2017, and April 30, 2022, at our institution and classified them according to whether they had an episode of AF in the perioperative period. The outcomes were defined the occurrence of CSF overall and in each of the three coronary arteries. The analysis was repeated after adjusting the baseline information by the propensity score matching method in a 1:1 ratio.Results214 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study (AF episode group: 100 patients, AF non-episode group: 114 patients). Before matching, age, left atrial size, ejection fraction, heart rate, CSF incidence, and mean corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame counts were higher in patients with intraoperative AF episodes than in patients without episodes. To prevent the dependent variable (CSF incidence) from being confounded by confounding factors, we matched the two groups for age, left atrial size, and ejection fraction. In the logistic regression analysis, the incidence of CSF was significantly higher in the intraoperative AF episode group (P = 0.010, OR = 2.327, 95% CI: 1.226–4.416) than in the non-episode group.ConclusionIn patients with AF, AF episode status is significantly correlated with an increased overall incidence of CSF.

BackgroundNumerous observational studies have suggested that atrial fibrillation (AF) was associated with an increased risk of vascular dementia (VaD). However, the causal genetic relationships between AF and VaD remains unclear. To evaluate the effect of AF on VaD, we performed the Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the causal genetic relationships between AF and VaD.MethodsThe bidirectional MR analysis was conducted to explore the causal relationships between exposure and disease. We applied a series of quality assessments to select significantly and independently single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from publicly available large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) databases. Three methods [Inverse variance weighted method (IVW), MR-Egger method, and weighted median (WM)method] were used to derive MR estimates. In order to ensure reliable MR results, sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity.ResultsOur MR analyses revealed no significant genetic relationships between AF and the risk of VaD (IVW: OR =  1.10, 95%CI = 0.95–1.28, P = 0.20). In the reverse direction analysis, there was no evidence to support a significant genetic relationship of VaD with AF risk (IVW: OR =  1.00, 95% CI = 0.99–1.01, P = 0.52). Consistent results were obtained using different MR methods. Sensitivity analyses suggested no significant horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity in the study.ConclusionThis MR analysis did not provide evidence to support the causal genetic relationships between AF on VaD risk and the causal effect of VaD on AF risk.