The evolutionary conservation and versatility of a new set of nuclear primers for the amplification of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer regions in insects and other invertebrates have been studied. These primers, conserved across Insecta and other invertebrates, are based on a comprehensive taxonomic survey of the current DNA sequence databases. Their versatility was demonstrated by extensive polymerase chain reaction assays in 16 species from two arachnid orders, eight insect orders, three invertebrate and vertebrate chordate orders and by direct sequencing of the amplified products. The availability of these primers to the insect research community should facilitate the use of internal transcribed spacer regions in intraspecific studies as well as phylogenetic analysis of closely related taxa.
Background: Highly migratory species are usually expected to have minimal population substructure because strong gene flow has the effect of homogenizing genetic variation over geographical populations, counteracting random drift, selection and mutation. The migratory locust Locusta migratoria belongs to a monotypic genus, and is an infamous pest insect with exceptional migratory ability -with dispersal documented over a thousand kilometers. Its distributional area is greater than that of any other locust or grasshopper, occurring in practically all the temperate and tropical regions of the eastern hemisphere. Consequently, minimal population substructuring is expected. However, in marked contrast to its high dispersal ability, three geographical subspecies have been distinguished in China, with more than nine being biologically and morphologically identified in the world. Such subspecies status has been under considerable debate.
Single copy nuclear polymorphic (scnp) DNA is potentially a powerful molecular marker for evolutionary studies of populations. However, a practical obstacle to its employment is the general problem of haplotype determination due to the common occurrence of heterozygosity in diploid organisms. We explore here a 'consensus vote' (CV) approach to this question, combining statistical haplotype reconstruction and experimental verification using as an example an indel-free scnp DNA marker from the flanking region of a microsatellite locus of the migratory locust. The raw data comprise 251-bp sequences from 526 locust individuals (1052 chromosomes), with 71 (28.3%) polymorphic nucleotide sites (including seven triallelic sites) and 141 distinct genotypes (with frequencies ranging from 0.2 to 25.5%). Six representative statistical haplotype reconstruction algorithms are employed in our CV approach, including one parsimony method, two expectation-maximization (EM) methods and three Bayesian methods. The phases of 116 ambiguous individuals inferred by this approach are verified by molecular cloning experiments. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the CV approach compared to inferences based on individual statistical algorithms. First, it has the unique power to partition the inferrals into a reliable group and an uncertain group, thereby allowing the identification of the inferrals with greater uncertainty (12.7% of the total sample in this case). This considerably reduces subsequent efforts of experimental verification. Second, this approach is capable of handling genotype data pooled from many geographical populations, thus tolerating heterogeneity of genetic diversity among populations. Third, the performance of the CV approach is not influenced by the number of heterozygous sites in the ambiguous genotypes. Therefore, the CV approach is potentially a reliable strategy for effective haplotype determination of nuclear DNA markers. Our results also show that rare variations and rare inferrals tend to be more vulnerable to inference error, and hence deserve extra surveillance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.