No abstract

Background: Uric acid (UA) has both antioxidative and pro-oxidative properties. The study aimed to investigate the relationship between serum UA and hemorrhagic transformation (HT) after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke Methods: The patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis from two hospitals in China were retrospectively analyzed. HT was evaluated using computed tomography images reviewed within 24- 36h after thrombolysis. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) was defined as HT accompanied by worsening neurological function. Multivariate logistic regression and spline regression models were performed to explore the relationship between serum UA levels and the risk of HT and sICH. Results: Among 503 included patients, 60 (11.9%) were diagnosed with HT and 22 (4.4%) developed sICH. Patients with HT had significant lower serum UA levels than those without HT (245 [214-325 vs. 312 [256-370] µmol/L, p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that patients with higher serum UA levels had a lower risk of HT (OR per 10-µmol/L increase 0.96, 95%CI 0.92–0.99, p = 0.015). Furthermore, multiple-adjusted spline regression models showed a Ushaped association between serum UA levels and HT (p < 0.001 for non-linearity). Similar results were present between serum UA and sICH. Restricted cubic spline models predicted the lowest risk of HT and sICH when the serum UA levels were 386µmol/L. Conclusion: The data show the U-shaped relationship between serum UA levels and the risk of HT and sICH after intravenous thrombolysis.

Introduction: To investigate the effects of paroxetine (PAR) on motor and cognitive function recovery in patients with non-depressed ischemic stroke (nD-AIS).Methods: One hundred sixty-seven patients hospitalized for non-depressed acute ischemic stroke were selected and divided into treatment (T) and control (C) groups using a random number table. All patients received conventional secondary ischemic stroke prevention and rehabilitation training; patients in Group T additionally received treatment with PAR (10 mg/day during week 1 and 20 mg/day thereafter) for 3 months. The follow-up observation lasted 6 months. The Fugl–Meyer motor scale (FMMS), Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), and Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) were used on D0, D15, D90, and D180 (T0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively; D180 = 90 days after treatment cessation) after study initiation, and scores were compared between the groups.Results: The FMMS and MoCA scores differed significantly between Groups T and C at T2 and T3 (p < .05); by contrast, these scores did not differ significantly between the groups at T1 (p > .05). Furthermore, the HAMD scores differed significantly between the two groups at T3 (p < .05), but not at T1 and T2 (p > .05).Conclusions: PAR treatment may improve motor and cognitive function recovery in patients with nD-AIS. Moreover, PAR may reduce the occurrence of depression after stroke.

No abstract