No abstract

No abstract

Background: Less than 5% of eligible adult cancer survivors participate in cancer clinical trials. Survivors identifying as Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) are less likely to participate in clinical trials compared to those identifying as non-Hispanic White. Common barriers to BIPOC participation are lack of knowledge, lack of access, and mistrust. These barriers are all factors in the disparities observed in BIPOC cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Clinical trials need adequate BIPOC representation to garner generalizable findings that can reduce or eliminate cancer disparities associated with the social construct of race.Aim: This systematic review examined the use of video education interventions to impact BIPOC survivor participation in clinical trials.Methods: Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases were queried for articles that described or tested video interventions aimed at increasing adult, BIPOC survivor clinical trial participation. Two authors independently screened articles for inclusion, appraised quality, and abstracted relevant data. All authors synthesized the data into themes through discussion and consensus. Results: The search yielded 2,512 articles. Seven selected articles described six distinct interventions. Although the six interventions reduced barriers to participation in clinical trials, their findings varied on Black and Hispanic survivors' readiness to enroll and participate in trials. Four themes emerged: (a) cultural sensitivity is needed in video development and delivery; (b) video content should be aimed to educate and change attitudes about clinical trials; (c) video interventions are feasible and acceptable; and (d) video interventions affect outcomes on intention or actual enrollment. Linking Evidence to Action: Video interventions are well-received by BIPOC survivors and may improve representation in clinical trials. Yet, video interventions are underutilized. More studies are needed to establish best practices for video interventions aimed at diversifying clinical trial participation as widening cancer disparities and rapidly changing cancer care continue to emerge.

105 Background: The incidence of AML is increasing, in part due to an aging population. Amid established intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous chemotherapies , recent drug approvals have ushered in an era of oral medication (OM) approaches to treating AML, shifting the burden of daily adherence from clinicians to patients. We aimed to identify and summarize adherence to oral therapy in this population. Methods: Our mixed methods study design used focus groups (FG) and patient surveys. After IRB approval, 11 patients and 4 caregivers participated in 4 focus groups. Results were used to develop a 37-item OM adherence needs assessment. Subsequently, AML patients were recruited and consented at three cancer centers to complete surveys (online, at the clinic, hospital, or from home). Results: 100 patients completed the OM survey. Most were male (62%), racial/ethnic diversity (33%), < 65 years (59%), and college-educated (52%). The to be taken was the most frequent and troublesome challenge. Loss of appetite was the most commonly reported and problematic side effect. Although half of the patients stated, “no side effect would cause them to stop taking OM”, another 25% indicated nausea would cause non-adherence. The best strategy to support taking OM was to make it part of the daily routine. Directions for taking OM were most commonly found on medication bottles or received from the health care team (HCT); patients felt HCTs were the best source of directions. Nearly 1/3 of patients indicated they skip the OM dose altogether when they forget to take it. When asked what would help improve adherence: smaller pills, easier packaging, and scheduling assistance were most frequently reported. Older individuals (>65 years) had a slightly more positive attitude towards oral medication (p =.51). Younger patients (<65 years) were more accepting of taking oral vs IV meds, (p = .03). Conclusions: This study represents the first assessment of OM adherence in patients with AML. Three themes emerged in FG transcript analysis that informed the development of a 37-item survey that was subsequently completed by 100 patients. Findings provide the basis for further exploration of interventions to enhance and increase adherence to OM regimens.

106 Background: AML is a disease of older adults (median age 67 years). Although standard AML treatment is intravenous (IV) chemotherapy, availability of oral anti-cancer medications has increased , providing benefits and risks to patients. Patients prefer their convenience, absence of IV infusions, potential for fewer clinic visits, and increased subjective feeling of control over their disease. Poor adherence can increase toxicity risk and compromise treatment effectiveness. We aim to identify barriers to adherence to oral medications in patients with AML and proposed solutions for improvements. Methods: Following IRB approval, patients with AML and their caregivers were recruited to participate in focus groups. An experienced moderator conducted the groups using an interview guide developed by AML experts. Participants received gift cards for their participation. Sessions were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed for thematic content using Dedoose qualitative software. Results: 11 patients (5 <65 years; 6 >65 years) and 4 caregivers participated in sessions lasting 60-75 minutes. Three central themes emerged: medication adherence challenges, managing an oral adherence plan, and strategies to improve oral adherence. Adherence challenges: number and size of pills, different directions, cost, availability, and side effects. An adherence plan was recommended: written schedules, take medications around meals, and use of pillboxes and alarms. Main sources of information: health care team and bottle directions. Recommendations for providing adherence assistance included better instructions, assistance with scheduling, making pills smaller, and consistency in packaging. Conclusions: Patients are an important source of insight into barriers and solutions to oral medication adherence. These responses were used to develop a survey to be administered to 100 patients with AML. Results will inform development of an intervention to improve oral medication adherence in the AML population.