Background Neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury (SCI), both traumatic and non-traumatic, is refractory to various treatments. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is one of the neuromodulation therapies for neuropathic pain, although SCS has insufficient efficacy for neuropathic pain after SCI. The reasons are presumed to be inappropriate locations of SCS leads and conventional tonic stimulation itself does not have a sufficient analgesic effect for the pain. In patients with past spinal surgical histories, the cylinder-type leads are likely to be placed on the caudal side of the SCI because of surgical adhesions. Differential target multiplexed (DTM) stimulation is one of the latest new stimulation patterns that is superior to conventional stimulation. Methods A single-center, open-label, randomized, two-way crossover trial is planned to investigate the efficacy of SCS using DTM stimulation placing a paddle lead at the appropriate site for neuropathic pain after SCI in patients with spinal surgical histories. The paddle-type lead delivers energy more efficiently than a cylinder-type lead. This study consists of two steps: SCS trial (first step) and SCS system implantation (second step). The primary outcome is rates of achieving pain improvement with more than 33% reduction 3 months after SCS system implantation. The secondary outcomes are to be evaluated as follows: (1) effectiveness of DTM and tonic stimulations during the SCS trial; (2) changes of assessment items from 1 to 24 months; (3) relationships between the result of the SCS trial and the effects 3 months after SCS system implantation; (4) preoperative factors associated with a long-term effect, defined as continuing for more than 12 months; and (5) whether gait function improves from 1 to 24 months. Discussion A paddle-type lead placed on the rostral side of SCI and using DTM stimulation may provide significant pain relief for patients with intractable neuropathic pain after SCI in patients with past spinal surgical histories. Trial registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) jRCT 1042220093. Registered on 21 November 2022, and last modified on 6 January 2023. jRCT is approved as a member of the Primary Registry Network of WHO ICTRP.

Background Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive genetic neuromuscular disorder with progressive muscle weakness and atrophy, mainly caused by lower motor neuron degeneration resulting from decreased levels of the survival motor neuron protein. Recently, 3 disease-modifying therapies for SMA (nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec, and risdiplam) were approved in Japan that are expected to improve the prognosis of patients with SMA. Long-term clinical follow-up of adult patients treated with disease-modifying therapies and the natural history of SMA are essential to assess the real-world effectiveness of available treatments. Until recently, nusinersen was the only treatment option for patients with SMA in Japan; however, because Japanese approval of nusinersen was based on global clinical trials in infants and children aged 0-15 years with SMA, the effectiveness of nusinersen in adult patients has not been fully assessed in Japan. In addition, longitudinal clinical data of adult patients have not been systematically collected in Japan. Objective This longitudinal observational study of adult patients with SMA who have been diagnosed with 5q-SMA in Japan aims to gain a better understanding of the natural history of SMA, as well as the long-term effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies. Here, we describe the protocol for the study. Methods The Japan Registry for Adult Subjects of Spinal Muscular Atrophy (jREACT-SMA) study is a longitudinal (prospective and retrospective) observational study with a 60-month prospective follow-up being conducted at 19 investigational sites using the newly established jREACT-SMA registry. Patients aged ≥18 years with genetically confirmed 5q-SMA were planned to be enrolled in the registry from December 2020 to May 2022. The planned enrollment was 100 patients. The protocol was approved on September 28, 2020 (approval 2020-0289) by the ethical review committee of Nagoya University. Registration, demographics, genetic diagnosis, motor functions, patient-reported outcomes/quality-of-life outcomes, and other clinical data have been or will be collected. Results As of May 2022, 113 patients had been enrolled, and the completion of patient registration has been extended from May 2022 to December 2022. Data at registration and during the follow-up period were and will be prospectively collected at least once a year until November 2025 (maximum 60 months). Data analyses will be conducted when all data have been collected. Results are expected to be available in 2026 and the study is expected to be completed by March 2027. Conclusions This jREACT-SMA study will provide longitudinal prospective follow-up data in adult patients with SMA in Japan, including data on the natural history of the disease and data on the long-term effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies. Trial Registration University Hospital Medical Information Network Center Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000042015; https://rctportal.niph.go.jp/en/detail?trial_id=UMIN000042015 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/38878

Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is one of the neuromodulation therapies for chronic neuropathic pain. The conventional paresthesia-based SCS involves the application of tonic stimulation that induces a sense of paresthesia. Recently, new SCS stimulation patterns without paresthesia have been developed. Differential target multiplexed (DTM) stimulation and fast-acting subperception therapy (FAST) stimulation are the latest paresthesia-free SCS patterns. Methods: A single-center, open-label, crossover, randomized trial to investigate the superiority of SCS using the latest new stimulation patterns over conventional tonic stimulation for neuropathic pain is planned. This study consists of two-steps: SCS trial (first step) and SCS system implantation (second step). In the SCS trial, participants will be randomly assigned to 4 groups receiving stimulation, including tonic, DTM, and FAST. Each stimulation will then be performed for 2 days, and a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain will be evaluated before and after each stimulation pattern. A stimulation-off period for 1 day is set between each stimulation pattern to washout the residual previous stimulation effects. Pain improvement is defined as more than 33% reduction on the pain VAS. The primary analysis will compare pain improvement between the new stimulation patterns and the conventional tonic stimulation pattern in the SCS trial. The secondary outcomes will be evaluated as follows: 1) the relationships between causative disease and improvement rate by each stimulation pattern; 2) comparison of pain improvement between the DTM and FAST stimulation patterns in all cases and by causative disease; 3) changes in assessment items preoperatively to 24 months after implantation; 4) preoperative factors associated with long-term effects defined as continuing for more than 12 months; and 5) adverse events related to this study 3 months after implantation. Discussion: This study aims to clarify the effectiveness of the latest new stimulation patterns compared to the conventional tonic stimulation. In addition, which stimulation pattern is most effective for which kind of causative disease will be clarified. Trial registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) 1042220094. Registered on 21 November 2022, and last modified on 6 January 2023. jRCT is an approved member of the Primary Registry Network of WHO ICTRP.