BackgroundThere is paucity of data as to the results of the endoscopic approach in comparison to the golden standard of nephro-ureterectomy in elective, low grade TCC, patients. Our purpose is to report our results of a nephron sparing approach compared to nephro-ureterectomy in those patients.MethodsFrom a retrospective data base we identified 25 patients and 23 patients who underwent a nephron sparing ureterosocpic resection and nephro-reterectomy for low grade UT-TCC, respectively. The endoscopic technique included endoscopic tumor biopsy followed by primary resection and/or fulguration. The nephron sparing group was followed by bi-annual ureteroscopy and upper tract imaging, timely cystoscopy and urine cytology collection. Data for overall and disease related mortality, bladder and ureteral TCC recurrence and renal function are reported in both groups.ResultsMedian follow - up time was 26 months. 11 (44%) patients developed bladder recurrence at a median period of 9 months after initial ureteroscopy, compared to 9 (39%) in the NUx group (P < 0.05). Recurrent ureteral low grade TCC was observed in 9 patients (median: 9 months). All were treated endoscopicaly successfully. Renal function remained stable in the nephron sparing group. No disease related mortality was recorded in the nephron-sparing group while one patient died of his disease following NUx.ConclusionsDisease related mortality following a nephron sparing endoscopic approach or nephroureterectomy for low grade upper tract TCC is excellent. However, the nephron sparing approach is associated with a relatively high rate of ureteral and bladder recurrence. Therefore, a stringent follow-up protocol is required.
1. The effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) enalapril, lisinopril and ramipril was studied on fructoseinduced hypertensive and hyperinsulinaemic rats.2. 60 Sprague-Dawley rats were fed a fructose-enriched diet for 5 weeks, which produced hyperinsulinaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia and hypertension. Beginning with week 3 of the diet, lisinopril(l0 and 20 mg per kg per day), ramipril(5 and 10 mg/kg per day) and enalapril (20 mg/kg per day) were given daily in drinking water for 2 weeks to 10 rats in each drug group. Ten rats fed only the fructose-enriched diet served as control.3. Systolic blood pressure was measured weekly by the indirect tail-cuff method. Plasma insulin level was determined using RIA.4. Data indicate that ACEI improve insulin resistance induced by high-fructose intake in rats; that despite their equal hypotensive effect, ACEI differ in their ability to improve insulin resistance; and that improvement of insulin resistance by ACEI is dose-dependent.
We examined accumulating evidence of the positive contribution of nitric oxide to the pharmacological effects of converting enzyme inhibitors in 36 rats rendered hypertensive, hyperinsulinemic, and hypertriglyceridemic by a fructose-enriched diet. We studied the response of blood pressure, insulin, and triglyceride levels to inhibition of either converting enzyme-kininase II, nitric oxide synthase, or both. Two weeks of the converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril (20 mg/kg) reduced blood pressure from 137 +/- 2 to 105 +/- 7 mm Hg, insulin from 7.6 +/- 2.0 to 2.2 +/- 1.1 pg/mL, and triglycerides from 292 +/- 37 to 163 +/- 37 mg/dL. Treatment with NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (100 mg/kg) raised blood pressure from 144 +/- 7 to 170 +/- 8 mm Hg without affecting the other parameters. Two weeks of concomitant treatment with both agents blunted the hypotensive and beneficial metabolic effects of enalapril; thus, final blood pressure (141 +/- 7 mm Hg), insulin (6.4 +/- 2.4 pg/mL), and triglyceride (231 +/- 51 mg/dL) values were no different from those of untreated fructose-fed rats. These data suggest that persistent synthesis of nitric oxide contributes to the vasodilator and metabolic effects of enalapril in the fructose-fed rat model.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.