Background and Aims: Infection is a serious and expensive complication of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) procedures. We performed a retrospective based cost analysis to estimate Trust level savings of using the TYRX TM antibacterial envelope as a primary prevention measure against infection in a tertiary referral centre in South London, United Kingdom. Methods: A retrospective cohort of heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction undergoing Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) procedures were evaluated. Decision-analytic modelling was performed to determine economic savings of using the envelope during CIED procedure versus CIED procedure alone. Results: Over a 12 month follow-up period following CIED procedure the observed infection rate was 3.14% (n=5/159). The average cost of a CIED infection inpatient admission was £41,820 and further to economic analysis, the additional costs attributable to infection was calculated at £62,213.94. A cost saving of £624 per patient by using TYRX TM during CIED procedure as a primary preventative measure against infection was estimated. Conclusions: TYRX™ would be a cost-saving treatment option amongst heart failure patients undergoing ICD and CRT device procedures based on analysis in the local geographical area of South London. If upscaled to the UK population, we estimate potential cost savings for the

ObjectiveGiven recent data on published diagnostic accuracies, this study sought to determine the most cost-effective diagnostic strategy for detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in stable angina patients using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the reference standard.MethodsA probabilistic decision-analytical model was developed which modelled a cohort of patients with stable angina. We investigated 17 diagnostic strategies between standalone and combination of different imaging tests to establish a correct diagnosis of CAD, using no testing as the baseline reference. These tests included CT coronary angiography (CTCA), stress echocardiography, CT-based FFR, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), positron emission tomography, ICA, and ICA with FFR. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated as the additional cost per correct diagnosis.ResultsSPECT followed by CTCA and ICA-FFR is the most cost-effective strategy between a cost-effectiveness threshold (CET) value of £1000–£3000 per correct diagnosis. CMR followed by CTCA and ICA-FFR is cost-effective within a CET range of £3000–£17 000 per correct diagnosis. CMR and ICA-FFR is cost-effective within a CET range of £17 000–£24 000. ICA-FFR as first line is the most-cost effective if the CET value exceeds the £24 000 per correct diagnosis. Sensitivity analysis showed that direct ICA-FFR may be cost-effective in patients with a high pre-test probability of CAD.ConclusionFirst-line testing with functional imaging is cost-effective at low to intermediate value of correct diagnosis in patients with low to intermediate risk of CAD. ICA is not cost effective although ICA-FFR may be at higher CET.

Objectives Our primary aim was to evaluate the healthcare resource use associated with the diagnosis of transthyretin amyloidosis cardiomyopathy. Second, we aim to assess the effect of the number of diagnostic tests and clinical contact points on the total time and costs between symptom onset and diagnosis defining a quantitative hypothetical optimized diagnostic pathway. Setting Clinical and cost data were collected from patients presenting between 2010 and 2018 in a tertiary referral institution in South London involving two participating hospitals. Participants Thirty‐eight adult patients with a definite diagnosis of transthyretin amyloidosis cardiomyopathy were included, mostly male (n = 28, 74%) and of African‐Caribbean descent (n = 23, 64%). We excluded patients without a confirmed transthyretin amyloidosis cardiomyopathy or those on inotersen, patisiran, or diflunisal at point of referral. Primary and secondary outcome measures The average time between first presentation and final diagnosis, and the cost per patient per month. By comparing to a more optimal clinical pathway towards diagnosis, we considered what could be the theoretical gain in terms of time to diagnosis and financial savings. Results The average time between first presentation and final diagnosis was 2.74 years. The average cost per patient per month was higher with progressive heart failure symptoms. A hypothetical optimal pathway reduces time to diagnosis of 1.65 to 1.74 years per patient. The potential financial savings are estimated within the range of £3000 to £4800 per patient. Conclusions Patients diagnosed with transthyretin amyloidosis cardiomyopathy have substantial healthcare resource utilization and costs starting from symptom onset. Higher costs were observed with progression in symptoms and appear linked to a delayed diagnosis. The number of additional diagnostic tests and clinical contact points may contribute to this and could represent a path to explore further for important health and cost savings, with more efficient pathways for these patients to be managed.

No abstract