Background The purpose of this study is to analyze the factors affecting the revision of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), and to summarize the complications and decision-making strategies for revision surgery after LLIF. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 21 cases suffered from a revision surgery after LLIF in our department from May 2017 to June 2020, with a mean follow-up of 14 months (12-25months). We collected X-ray plain films, CT (computed tomography), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) and medical records of all patients undergoing LLIF surgery, then analyzed the reasons for revision and summarized the revision strategies in different situations. We analysed correlations between revision surgery and several factors, including age, body mass index (BMI), sex, bone quality, mode of internal fixation, spinal stenosis, postperative foraminal stenosis, disc height. Then we brought the different indicators into logistic regression to find out the risk factors of revision after LLIF. All these patients were evaluated by Quality-of-life outcomes. Univariate statistical analysis was performed using T-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests and Chi square tests. Results Of the 209 cases of LLIF, 21 patients underwent postoperative revision. All revision surgeries were successfully completed. The reasons for revision included vascular injury, unsatistactory implant placement, internal spinal instrumentation failure, cage migration, indirect decompression failure and infection. Indirect decompression failure was the most common indications for revision. Clinical status was apparently improved in ODI scores and VAS scores. Revision surgery did not impact long-term effect and satisfaction. Postoperative foraminal stenosis is a positive predictor for a revision surgical procedure. Conclusion Patients with postoperative foraminal stenosis are at higher risk of undergoing revision surgery after lateral lumbar interbody fusion. The correct choice of revision surgery can achieve satisfactory clinical results.

No abstract

ObjectiveConventional open internal fixation surgery for thoracolumbar fractures has many complications and long recovery time. There are few clinical studies on the minimally invasive percutaneous injured vertebrae screw internal fixation. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the application value of minimally invasive percutaneous injured vertebrae screw internal fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures (TF).MethodsA total of 98 patients with TF admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. According to the surgical method, the patients were divided into the study group (n = 49, treated with minimally invasive percutaneous injured vertebrae screw internal fixation) and the control group (n = 49, treated with traditional open internal fixation surgery). The two groups were compared in the perioperative period, the degree of pain at different periods, the percentage of the height of the anterior edge of the injured vertebra, the Cobb angle of the injured vertebra body and the wedge angle of the injured vertebra body at the first week and the last follow‐up, and the postoperative complications and the occurrence of the cone shell after the operation were recorded. Then, statistical analysis such as Student's t test or Chi‐Square test was performed.ResultsThe operation time (p = 0.002), intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001), postoperative drainage volume (p = 0.011), and length of hospital stay (p = 0.003) in the study group were significantly lower than that in the control group. The VAS in the study group (3.38 ± 1.02) was significantly lower than that in the control group (4.56 ± 1.04) on the 7th day after the operation, with a significant difference (p < 0.001). The correction values of the percentage of leading edge height (LEH), Cobb angle, wedge angle in the study group were significantly lower than that in the control group at 1 week after surgery (all ps < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications in the study group (one case, 2.04%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (seven cases, 14.29%) (p = 0.031). At 1 month, 6 months, 10 months, and the last follow‐up, the incidence of “empty shell” on CT scan in the study group were lower than that in the control group with a significant difference (all ps < 0.05).ConclusionApplying minimally invasive percutaneous injured vertebrae screw internal fixation is more beneficial to shorten the operation time and hospital stay, with fewer postoperative complications.

No abstract