A face mask is essential personal protective equipment to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. While a cloth mask has the least ability to prevent the passage of infectious respiratory droplets through it compared to surgical and N95 masks, the surgical mask does not fit snugly and causes significant air leakage. The synthetic fibers in the latter reduce comfortability and are an allergen for facial eczema. Moreover, the N95 mask causes CO$_2$ inhalation and reduces heat transfer in the nose. Therefore, the objective of the present work is to improve the effectiveness of a two-layer cloth mask by introducing an intermediate, high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter layer. A significant volume of impacted droplets penetrates through a single-layer cloth mask, ejecting secondary droplets from the rear side. However, a two-layer cloth mask prevents this ejection. Despite slowing down the liquid penetration, capillary imbibition through cloth due to its hydrophilicity causes the transport of the liquid into the second layer, resulting in a thin-liquid layer at the mask's rear-side surface and contaminating it. Conversely, the HEPA filter insert in the cloth mask prevents the imbibition, making the second cloth layer free of contamination. We attribute the impedance to the imbibition by the intermediate HEPA filter layer to its hydrophobic characteristics. We experimentally and analytically assess the role of wettability on capillary imbibition. The breathability measurements of masks show that the HEPA insert in the cloth mask does not reduce its breathability compared to that of the surgical mask.
N95 mask has emerged as a potential measure to mitigate the airborne transmission of respiratory disease such as COVID-19. Herein, we experimentally investigated the impact and interaction of pure water droplets as surrogate to respiratory droplets with the different layers of a commercially available N95 mask to demonstrate the penetration and passage-capability of respiratory fluids through the different layers. The penetration of an impacting droplet through the mask layers was characterized by elucidating the ejection of secondary droplets from the rear-side surface of the target mask material. In addition, the passage of respiratory fluids through the mask layers was characterized by capillary imbibition of the droplet liquid through the pores, as a function of wettability of the mask material. Droplet impact at Weber numbers We = 208 and 416 has been considered in the present study; the chosen We range corresponds to that of cough droplets realized in real respiratory events. Each layer of the N95 mask is hydrophobic that prevents capillary imbibition through the pores: a sessile droplet placed over the surface exhibits classical diffusion-limited evaporation. Droplet impact experiments on N95 mask layer surfaces reveal that a single layer allows liquid penetration at We = 416; while a combination of five layers, as is the case of a commercially available N95 mask, blocks the penetration completely, consistent with the widely known effectiveness of N95 masks. Herein, we devote special attention to compare the so-obtained efficiency of N95 masks to that of a recently designed two-layer cloth mask containing an intermediate High-Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filter layer (Narayan et al. in Phys Fluids 34:061703, 2022). We conclusively show that the performance of the designed cloth mask is identical to that of a commercially available N95 mask. The assessment of mask effectiveness further includes examination of breathability and comfort by means of passage of air through them. A comparative study has been presented herein for a clear demonstration of effectiveness of different masks in preventing air-borne transmission of COVID-19.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.