Background: Acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) has increased in the past decade, and many new treatments and rehabilitation regimens have been introduced. But major complications in ATR management remain an unsolved problem. Purpose: To compare the risk of major complications of acute ATR after different combinations of treatments and rehabilitation regimens. Study Design: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Method: The authors searched 4 databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) from the date of inception until February 2018 for articles in English. The authors considered randomized controlled trials comparing interventions and rehabilitation protocols for acute ATR and restricted (1) interventions to nonoperative treatment, minimally invasive surgery, and open surgery and (2) rehabilitation protocols to accelerated rehabilitation and early immobilization. Major complications were assessed—namely, rerupture, deep infection, and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Only patients with primary acute ATR were considered. Quality assessment was performed with the Cochrane “risk of bias” tool. A series of additional tests were conducted to ensure the validity of the results. Results: Twenty-nine randomized controlled trials with 2060 patients were included in this Bayesian network meta-analysis. The mean incidence of overall major complications from all managements was 9.13% (median, 6.67%). The mean incidence rates of rerupture, deep infection, and DVT from all managements were 5%, 1.50%, and 2.67%, respectively. According to relative risk, nonoperative treatment combined with early immobilization was significantly associated with a higher risk of major complications. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve, minimally invasive surgery with accelerated rehabilitation had the highest possibility (79.7%) of being the best management with regard to minimizing major complications. Conclusion: For treating acute ATR, management combining minimally invasive surgery with accelerated rehabilitation had the highest possibility of being superior in terms of major complication risks, according to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Management combining nonoperative treatment with early immobilization was statistically associated with a higher risk of complications as compared with the other methods of management.

No abstract

Background: Although nonoperative management of acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is a reasonable option, surgical repair has attracted attention for young and active patients. More reliable Achilles tendon repair techniques are needed to enhance recovery after ATR in this population. Purpose/Hypothesis: To biomechanically analyze the panda rope bridge technique (PRBT) and compare it with other minimally invasive repair techniques over a simulated, progressive rehabilitation program. It was hypothesized that PRBT would result in better biomechanical properties and enhanced recovery after ATR. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: An Achilles tendon rupture was created 4 cm from the distal tendon insertion site in 40 bovine lower extremities, and specimens were then randomly allocated to 5 Achilles tendon repair techniques: (1) Achillon, (2) modified Achillon, (3) Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS), (4) modified PARS, and (5) PRBT. Each group was subjected to a cyclic loading protocol that was representative of progressive postoperative rehabilitation for ATR (250 cycles at 1 Hz for each loading stage: 20-100 N, 20-200 N, 20-300 N, and 20-400 N). Results: The PRBT technique demonstrated significantly less elongation (1.62 ± 0.25 mm) than the 4 other repair techniques after the first loading stage of 20 to 100 N ( P < .05). All specimens in the 4 other groups developed a large gap (elongation ≥5 mm) at the 20- to 200-N loading stage. When overall biomechanical performance was examined, the PRBT group exhibited higher strength (20-400 N) and more mean loading cycles (984 ± 10) compared with the 4 other groups ( P < .05). Conclusion: In this bovine model, PRBT biomechanically outperformed the other minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair techniques that were tested and could therefore meet the requirements of accelerated rehabilitation. Clinical Relevance: The reduced tendency for premature rerupture and the overall improved biomechanical properties of PRBT suggest that ATR patients treated with PRBT may more readily complete early and aggressive postoperative rehabilitation protocols. In addition, they may have a lower risk of early irreversible suture failure.

Purpose: Postoperative anemia has been a threat to total hip arthroplasty patients. We introduced a novel medullary cavity hemostasis (MCH) technique and combined it with tranexamic acid (TXA) to prevent postoperative anemia in elder patients. This trial was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of this technique. Methods: In this retrospective consecutive study, each group has 88 patients who were all over 70 years old. In the control group, patients were given TXA. In the experimental group, the MCH technique and same TXA application were used. Results: The average of total blood loss, drainage volume, and hidden blood loss were significantly less in the experimental group. The postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) level was significantly higher in the experimental group (100.6 g/dL) than it is in the control group (81.4 g/dL). None of the patient has shown signs of prosthesis subsidence, periprosthetical osteolysis, or stem loosening during follow-ups in the average follow-up time of 3 years. Conclusion: We discovered that application of TXA alone is not sufficient to prevent postoperative moderate anemia in patients over 70 years old. Combination of TXA and MCH is an effective and safe way to alleviate the severity of postoperative anemia.

No abstract