ImportanceThe prognosis for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is dismal, due in part to chemoresistance. Bacteria-mediated mechanisms of chemoresistance suggest a potential role for antibiotics in modulating response to chemotherapy.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether use of peritreatment antibiotics is associated with survival among patients with metastatic PDAC treated with first-line gemcitabine or fluorouracil chemotherapy.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsUsing the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare linked database, this retrospective cohort study analyzed data for patients diagnosed with PDAC between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2017. Data analysis was conducted between September 1, 2021, and January 15, 2023. The population-based sample included 3850 patients with primary metastatic PDAC treated with first-line gemcitabine or fluorouracil chemotherapy. Patients who received antibiotics were matched based on propensity scores to patients who did not receive antibiotics.ExposuresReceipt of 5 or more days of oral antibiotics or 1 injectable antibiotic in the month before or after beginning first-line chemotherapy.Main Outcomes and MeasuresOverall survival and cancer-specific survival. The end of follow-up was December 31, 2019, for overall survival and December 31, 2018, for cancer-specific survival.ResultsOf the 3850 patients treated with first-line gemcitabine (3150 [81.8%]) or fluorouracil (700 [18.2%]), 2178 (56.6%) received antibiotics. The mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 74.2 (5.8) years and patients were predominantly women (2102 [54.6%]), White (3396 [88.2%]), and from metropolitan areas (3393 [88.1%]) in the northeastern or western US (2952 [76.7%]). In total, 1672 propensity-matched pairs were analyzed. Antibiotic receipt was associated with an 11% improvement in overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.96; P = .003) and a 16% improvement in cancer-specific survival (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77-0.92; P < .001) among patients treated with gemcitabine. In contrast, there was no association between antibiotic receipt and overall survival (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.90-1.29; P = .41) or cancer-specific survival (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.90-1.36; P = .29) among patients treated with fluorouracil. In a subgroup of gemcitabine-treated patients who received antibiotics, nonpenicillin β-lactams were associated with an 11% survival benefit (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.97; P = .01).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, receipt of perichemotherapy antibiotics was associated with improved survival among patients treated with gemcitabine, but not fluorouracil, suggesting that antibiotics may modulate bacteria-mediated gemcitabine resistance and have the potential to improve PDAC outcomes.

Long-term survivals of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unfavorable, which is largely attributed to active carcinogenesis. Growing studies have suggested that the reliable gene signature could act as an independent prognosis factor for HCC patients. We tried to screen the survival-related genes and develop a prognostic prediction model for HCC patients based on the expression profiles of the critical survival-related genes. In this study, we analyzed TCGA datasets and identified 280 genes with differential expressions (125 increased genes and 155 reduced genes). We analyzed the prognosis value of the top 10 dysregulated genes in HCC patients and identified three critical genes, including FCN3, CDC20, and E2F1, which were confirmed to be associated with long-term survival in both TCGA and ICGC datasets. The results of the LASSO model screened CDC20 and FCN3 for the development of the prognostic model. The CDC20 expression was distinctly increased in HCC specimens, while the FCN3 expression was distinctly decreased in HCC. At a suitable cutoff, patients were divided into low-risk and high-risk groups. Survival assays revealed that patients in high-risk groups exhibited a shorter overall survival than those in low-risk groups. Finally, we examine the relationships between risk score and immune infiltration abundance in HCC and observed that risk score was positively correlated with infiltration degree of B cells, T cell CD4+ cells, neutrophil, macrophage, and myeloid dendritic cells. Overall, we identified three critical survival-related genes and used CDC20 and FCN3 to develop a novel model for predicting outcomes and immune landscapes for patients with HCC. The above three genes also have a high potential for targeted cancer therapy of patients with HCC.

BackgroundIn patients with cirrhosis, portal hypertension increases intestinal permeability, dysbiosis, and bacterial translocation, promoting an inflammatory state that can lead to the progression of liver disease and development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to investigate whether beta blockers (BBs), which can mediate portal hypertension, conferred survival benefits in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, observational study of 578 patients with unresectable HCC treated with ICI from 2017 to 2019 at 13 institutions across three continents. BB use was defined as exposure to BBs at any time during ICI therapy. The primary objective was to assess the association of BB exposure with overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives were to evaluate the association of BB use with progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria.ResultsIn our study cohort, 203 (35%) patients used BBs at any point during ICI therapy. Of these, 51% were taking a nonselective BB. BB use was not significantly correlated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.12, 95% CI 0.9-1.39, P = 0.298), PFS (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.83-1.26, P = 0.844) or ORR (odds ratio [OR] 0.84, 95% CI 0.54-1.31, P = 0.451) in univariate or multivariate analyses. BB use was also not associated with incidence of adverse events (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.96-1.97, P = 0.079). Specifically, nonselective BB use was not correlated with OS (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.66-1.33, P = 0.721), PFS (HR 0.92, 0.66-1.29, P = 0.629), ORR (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.58-2.49, P = 0.623), or rate of adverse events (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.46-1.47, P = 0.510).ConclusionIn this real-world population of patients with unresectable HCC treated with immunotherapy, BB use was not associated with OS, PFS or ORR.

Objective To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of small liver metastatic tumors. Methods Fifty-eight patients with small liver metastatic tumors who underwent HIFU (n = 28) or MWA (n = 30) at Suining Central Hospital between January 2016 and December 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups. Results Operation times were longer and hospitalization costs were lower in the HIFU group than in the MWA group. Postoperative hospitalization times, tumor ablation rates, and clinical response and control rates did not differ significantly between the two groups 1 month after surgery. Rates of postoperative complications such as fever, liver dysfunction, injury, pain, and biliary leakage did not differ between the two groups. The 1- and 3-year cumulative survival rates were 96.4% and 52.4%, respectively, after HIFU and 93.3% and 51.4%, respectively, after MWA, which did not represent significant differences. Conclusions HIFU is a safe and feasible method of treating small liver metastatic tumors. Compared with MWA, HIFU was associated with lower hospitalization costs, reduced trauma, and fewer postoperative complications, making it a promising new local ablative treatment option for liver metastatic tumors.

Rationale: Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH) is defined as hemorrhage originating from the gastrointestinal tract proximal to the ligament of Treitz. The causes of UGIH include esophagitis, gastritis, peptic ulcers, Mallory-Weiss syndrome, and cancer. However, a rare cause of UGIH, such as an accessory spleen, may lead to serious complications if left untreated and can sometimes be very difficult to diagnose preoperatively.Patient concerns: An 18-year-old man was admitted to the Department of Gastroenterology of our hospital due to "repeated black stool for 2 months with aggravation, accompanied by hematemesis for 9 days." He denied any history of hepatitis, trauma, or surgery.Diagnosis: Laboratory evaluation revealed severe anemia (hemoglobin, 6.4 g/dL). Computed tomography revealed a mass measuring 127 mm in its largest dimension, located in the upper left abdomen, with varicose veins in the gastric fundus. Moreover, distended blue-purple tortuous veins were observed by gastroscopy in the gastric fundus. We believed the mass was likely an abnormally proliferating accessory spleen; however, the causes of severe anemia and gastrointestinal hemorrhage were unknown.Interventions: After discussion in a multidisciplinary conference, the mass was completely resected laparoscopically, and the subserosal veins in the gastric fundus were sutured using absorbable threads.Outcomes: After the surgery, the patient recovered uneventfully without any complications. Clinicopathological examination showed that the mass was chronic congestive splenomegaly. Gastrointestinal hemorrhage secondary to an abnormally proliferating accessory spleen was confirmed as the diagnosis. Laboratory evaluation revealed hemoglobin at 12.1 g/dL 2 months after surgery. At the 12-month follow-up, the patient showed no recurrence of gastrointestinal hemorrhage.Lessons: UGIH caused by accessory spleen is extremely rare. This entity should be considered in differential diagnosis of gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Surgical intervention is necessary for timely diagnosis and treatment in case of gastrointestinal hemorrhage in critical clinical situations.