No abstract

I n t h i s p a p e r , w e f o c u s a T E I m a r k u p f o r t h e c o n t e n t o f T a n g p o em s . B a s e d o n t e x t b o o k s o fJ a p a n e s e h i g h s c h o o l s a n d j u n i o r h i g h s c h o o l s i n 2 0 1 6 , w e r e p r e s e n t f u l l t e x t o f T a n g p o em s a l o n g w i t h t h e k u n t e n i n f o rm a t i o n o n p u n c t u a t e d t e x t ( k u n d o k u b u n ; 訓読文) . A s a r e s u l t , w e s h ow t h e r e s u l t s o f m a r k u p e d t e x t w h i c h a r e m a d e a s t h e s am e a s t h e o r i g i n a l f u l l t e x t i n t e x t b o o k s .

No abstract

By combining the idea of property concepts and the kernel-based theory of subjectivity, this paper proposes an analysis of the otherwise mysterious behavior of the Mandarin “you” predicates, where subjectivity/evidentiality and possessive/attributive readings come and go in an intricate way. The paper presents a phenomenon of Mandarin called possessive Property Concept predicates, involving a possessive morpheme you “have” and a bare NP. Studying the subjectivity puzzle in Chinese advances our understanding of information source and information force in the following way. The Chinese fact, as a separate element, is part of the bigger picture about subjectivity. To explain how the subjectivity predicate as a natural class connects with evidentiality, this paper provides an approach to probe subjectivity through examining the information source change, which is derived from removing or adding evidential morpheme(s).