Dendritic cells (DCs) are the most efficient antigen-presenting cells, playing a key role in the adaptive immune responses to viral infections. Our studies demonstrate that wild-type (wt) rabies virus (RABV) does not activate DCs. Adoptive transfer of DCs primed with wt RABV did not activate DCs, stimulate virus neutralizing antibodies (VNA), or protect recipients against challenge. However, adoptive transfer of DCs primed with laboratory-attenuated RABV resulted in DC activation, production of VNA, and protection against challenge. In vitro studies with recombinant RABV (laboratory-attenuated RABV expressing the glycoprotein or the phosphoprotein from wt RABV) demonstrate that DC activation is dependent on the glycoprotein and involves the IPS-1 pathway. Furthermore, binding to and entry into DCs by wt RABV is severely blocked, and the copy number of de novo-synthesized leader RNA was two logs lower in DCs infected with the wt than in DCs treated with laboratory-attenuated RABV. However, transient transfection of DCs with synthesized leader RNA from either wt or attenuated RABV is capable of activating DCs in a dose-dependent manner. Thus, the inability of wt RABV to activate DCs correlates with its low level of the de novo-synthesized leader RNA. IMPORTANCERabies remains a public health threat, with more than 55,000 fatalities each year around the world. Since DCs play a key role in the adaptive immune responses to viral infections, we investigated the ability of rabies virus (RABV) to activate DCs. It was found that the adoptive transfer of DCs primed with wt RABV did not activate DCs, stimulate VNA, or protect mice against lethal challenge. However, laboratory-attenuated RABV mediates the activation of DCs via the IPS-1 pathway and is glycoprotein dependent. We further show that wt RABV evades DC-mediated immune activation by inefficient binding/entry into DCs and as a result of a reduced level of de novo-synthesized leader RNA. These findings may have important implications in the development of efficient rabies vaccines. Despite the fact that rabies is one of the oldest human infectious diseases, it continues to present a public health threat by causing more than 55,000 human deaths every year around the globe (1). Its causative agent, rabies virus (RABV), belongs to the Rhabdoviridae family, and its genome encodes five structural proteins in the order of nucleoprotein (N), phosphoprotein (P), matrix protein (M), glycoprotein (G), and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp; also termed large protein [L]) (2). Among these, RABV G is the only viral protein that is glycosylated and exposed on the surface of the virion (3). RABV G is responsible for binding to neurospecific receptors, such as the acetylcholine receptor and neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM), for invasion into the nervous system (4, 5). Moreover, RABV G is the only protein capable of inducing virus-neutralizing antibodies (VNA) that are protective against rabies (6-8).It has been known for a long time that most of the human rabies patient...

Rabies virus (RABV) induces encephalomyelitis in humans and animals. One of the major problems with rabies is that the infected individuals most often do not develop virus neutralizing antibodies (VNA). In this study we have investigated the host immune response to RABV infection in dogs, using a live-attenuated (TriGAS) or a wild-type (wt) (DRV-NG11) RABV isolated from a rabid dog.Methodology/Principal FindingsThe experimental infection of dogs with TriGAS induced high levels of VNA in the serum, whereas wt RABV infection did not. Dogs infected with TriGAS developed antibodies against the virus including its glycoprotein, whereas dogs infected with DRV-NG11 only developed rabies antibodies that are presumably specific for the nucleoprotein, (N) and not the glycoprotein (G). We show that infection with TriGAS induces early activation of B cells in the draining lymph nodes and persistent activation of DCs and B cells in the blood. On the other hand, infection with DRV-NG11 fails to induce the activation of DCs and B cells and further reduces CD4 T cell production. Further, we show that intrathecal (IT) immunization of TriGAS not only induced high levels of VNA in the serum but also in the CSF while intramuscular (IM) immunization of TriGAS induced VNA only in the serum. In addition, high levels of total protein and WBC were detected in the CSF of IT immunized dogs, indicating the transient enhancement of blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, which is relevant to the passage of immune effectors from periphery into the CNS.Conclusions/SignificanceIM infection of dogs with TriGAS induced the production of serum VNA whereas, IT immunization of TriGAS in dogs induces high levels of VNA in the periphery as well as in the CSF and transiently enhances BBB permeability. In contrast, infection with wt DRV-NG11 resulted in the production of RABV-reactive antibodies but VNA and antibodies specific for G were absent. As a consequence, all of the dogs infected with wt DRV-NG11 succumbed to rabies. Thus the failure to activate protective immunity is one of the important features of RABV pathogenesis in dogs.

Previous studies have shown that wild-type (wt) rabies virus (RABV) evades the host immune response by restricting expression of glycoprotein (G), which blocks activation of dendritic cells (DCs) and induces production of virus-neutralizing antibodies (VNAs). In the present study, wt RABVs not only restricted G expression but also reduced incorporation of G into mature virions compared with laboratory-adapted viruses. A recombinant RABV expressing triple G was used to further determine whether G expression relates to incorporation. The recombinant virus showed higher expression and incorporation of G and activated more DCs than the virus that expressed a single copy of G. Removal of G from viruses using subtilisin or Dithiothreitol (DTT)/ Nonidet P-40 (NP40) almost completely abolishes DC activation and VNA production. Consequently, these G-depleted viruses cause lethal infection in mice. Thus, wt RABVs can subvert DC-induced antiviral immune response and maintain pathogenicity by decreasing G expression in infected cells and G incorporation into virions.