Epidemiological studies have established associations between various reproductive factors and risk of ovarian cancer; it has also been observed that some of these risk factors are only associated with specific histological subgroups. To investigate the correlation of genetic alterations with these risk factors, we examined a consecutive series of 158 ovarian cancer cases treated at the University of Kentucky (1990-96). Common molecular genetic alterations (LOH on chromosome 17, P53 alterations, K-RAS mutations), histological and clinical characteristics of the disease, demographic patient information and survival were evaluated. These latter data were from the Kentucky Cancer Registry. Univariate analysis showed higher frequencies of chromosome 17 loss and P53 mutations in tumors of advanced stage and grade, and in older and post-menopausal women. Non-mucinous tumors were more likely to be classified as late stage, high-grade cancers, and to have chromosome 17 loss and P53 mutations. Survival analysis indicated that stage was the only independent significant variable. When stage was the outcome variable in multiple logistic regression analysis, histology and chromosome 17 loss were significantly associated with poor survival. This case-case study provides evidence that ovarian cancers of mucinous and non-mucinous histology are significantly different with respect to clinical characteristics, survival and molecular alterations. It also lends support to the hypothesis that ovarian cancer is a heterogeneous disease with distinct etiological factors and clinical outcomes, which may require different approaches to treatment.

No abstract

No abstract

The clinical differentiation between hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis (AFAP) is very difficult. The 62-yr-old proband presented with duodenal adenocarcinoma. His history of subtotal colectomy for colon cancer, the rarity of duodenal adenocarcinoma in the general population, and his family history of colon cancer made us suspect that he might have FAP. We investigated this family by obtaining medical records and performing gene analysis. The proband had only 10 adenomatous colon polyps when he underwent subtotal colectomy for the cancer, so classic FAP was excluded. His family history included rectal cancer in his brother at 69 yr of age, colon cancer in his mother at 75 yr, and colon cancer in one maternal cousin at 42 yr. Three months after we started to study this family, the proband's 32-yr-old son presented with rectal cancer. His family fulfilled the Amsterdam criteria for HNPCC, but AFAP could not be excluded. Upon gene testing, the proband was negative for APC gene germline mutation, which made AFAP highly unlikely. Moreover, high microsatellite instability (MSI) was detected in his adenomas and cancer tissues. The fulfillment of Amsterdam criteria, the exclusion of FAP and AFAP, and the high MSI established the diagnosis of HNPCC in this family. We also summarize the differences between FAP, AFAP, and HNPCC; extend the graphic description of the MSI mechanism; and propose a diagnostic strategy for HNPCC.

No abstract