This study assessed the application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in pathogen detection of periprosthetic joint infections. A total of 95 cases who previously had undergone hip and knee replacement undergoing revision from January 2018 to January 2021 were included in this study. Specimens of synovial fluid and deep-tissue were collected for culture and metagenomic next-generation sequencing, and patients were retrospectively categorized as infected or aseptic using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria after revision surgery. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were compared. A total of 36 cases had positive culture results and 59 cases had positive metagenomic next-generation sequencing results. Culture was positive in 34 infected cases (58.6%) and 2 aseptic cases (5.4%). Metagenomic next-generation sequencing was positive in 55 infected cases (94.8%) and 4 aseptic cases (10.8%). Five cases diagnosed with infection had other potential pathogens detected by metagenomic next-generation sequencing. Among the 24 culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections, metagenomic next-generation sequencing was able to identify potential pathogens in 21 cases (87.5%). From sampling to reporting, the average time needed for culture was 5.2 (95% CI 3.1–7.3) days, while that for metagenomic next-generation sequencing was 1.3 (95% CI 0.9–1.7) days. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing is more advantageous in pathogen detection of periprosthetic joint infection after total joint replacement, especially in patients with multiple infections or negative culture results.

What is known and objective Up to now, no study focused on the role of SdrG in PJI after THA. To explore the mechanism of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods Joint fluid and blood were collected from patients with PJI after THA, aseptic loosening of the joints or bacterial infection after traumatic fractures of the extremities alone. The expression of SdrG in the 3 groups was determined by agarose gel electrophoresis. The expression of protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor J (PTPRJ) was measured by immunohistochemistry method. The platelet adhesion rate was determined by biochemical analysis. The content of D‐dimer, CRP and ESR in blood was determined by latex agglutination method. Multiple linear correlation analysis was used to analyse the correlation between PJI and the expression of PTPRJ protein, platelet adhesion rate, D‐dimer content, CRP and ESR. Results and discussion The expression of SdrG and PTPRJ in PJI group was markedly increased compared to the other 2 groups. The platelet adhesion rate in PJI group was markedly larger compared to aseptic loosening and simple wound infection group, and the rate in simple wound infection group was larger than aseptic loosening group. The level of D‐dimer, CRP and ESR in PJI group was higher than that of the other groups. The expression of PTPRJ protein, D‐dimer content, CRP and ESR was all closely related to PJI, while platelet adhesion rate had no correlation with PJI. What is new and conclusion SDRG gene around joint prosthesis was over‐expressed, which activated joint surface membrane protein PTPRJ and then induced platelet aggregation to reduce joint function.