Laparoscopic splenectomy without platelet transfusion can be a feasible and safe procedure in patients with a platelet count lower than 20x109/L, with a normal prothrombin time and without any preoperative bleeding tendency or severe coagulopathy.
Background
The efficacy of repeat hepatic resection (rHR) in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma compared with radiofrequency or microwave ablation after resection of the primary tumour remains controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare the safety and efficacy of these procedures.
Methods
PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were systematically searched to identify related studies published before 10 October 2021. Overall and recurrence-free survival after different treatments were compared based on pooled hazard ratios with a random-effects model.
Results
Two randomized clinical trials and 28 observational studies were included, involving 1961 and 2787 patients who underwent rHR and ablation respectively. Median perioperative mortality in both groups was zero but patients in the rHR group had higher median morbidity rates (17.0 per cent) than those in the ablation group (3.3 per cent). rHR achieved significantly longer recurrence-free survival than ablation (HR 0.79, 95 per cent c.i. 0.70 to 0.89, P < 0.001), while both groups had similar overall survival (HR 0.93, 95 per cent c.i. 0.83 to 1.04, P = 0.18).
Conclusion
rHR and ablation based on radio- or microwaves are associated with similar overall survival in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after resection of the primary tumour.
Tumor cells use metabolic reprogramming to keep up with the need for bioenergy, biosynthesis, and oxidation balance needed for rapid tumor division. This phenomenon is considered a marker of tumors, including colon cancer (CRC). As an important pathway of cellular energy metabolism, fatty acid metabolism plays an important role in cellular energy supply and oxidation balance, but presently, our understanding of the exact role of fatty acid metabolism in CRC is limited. Currently, no lipid metabolism therapy is available for the treatment of CRC. The establishment of a lipidmetabolism model regulated by oncogenes/tumor suppressor genes and associated with the clinical characteristics of CRC is necessary to further understand the mechanism of fatty acid metabolism in CRC. In this study, through multi-data combined with bioinformatic analysis and basic experiments, we introduced a tumor suppressor gene, EPHX2, which is rarely reported in CRC, and confirmed that its inhibitory effect on CRC is related to fatty acid degradation.
Previous studies have reported that m6a modification promotes tumor immune escape by affecting tumor microenvironment (TME). Due to the complexity of TME, a single biomarker is insufficient to describe the complex biological characteristics of tumor and its microenvironment. Therefore, it is more meaningful to explore a group of effective biomarkers reflecting different characteristics of cancer to evaluate the biological characteristics of solid tumors. Here, the immune gene CD34/CD276 with different m6A peak was obtained by m6A sequencing (MeRIP-seq) of colon cancer (CRC)clinical samples and combined with MsIgDB database, which was used to perform cluster analysis on TCGA-COAD level 3 data. The CD34/CD276 as a molecular marker for CRC prognosis was confirmed by survival analysis and immunohistochemical assay. Further bioinformatics analysis was carried out to analyze the molecular mechanism of CD34/CD276 affecting the TME through m6a-dependent down-regulation and ultimately promoting immune escape of CRC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.