Resistance mutations to hepatitis C virus (HCV) nonstructural protein 3 (NS3) protease inhibitors in <1% of the viral quasispecies may still allow >1000-fold viral load reductions upon treatment, consistent with their reported reduced replicative fitness in vitro. Recently, however, an R155K protease mutation was reported as the dominant quasispecies in a treatment-naïve individual, raising concerns about possible full drug resistance. To investigate the prevalence of dominant resistance mutations against specifically targeted antiviral therapy for HCV (STAT-C) in the population, we analyzed HCV genome sequences from 507 treatment-naïve patients infected with HCV genotype 1 from the United States, Germany, and Switzerland. Phylogenetic sequence analysis and viral load data were used to identify the possible spread of replication-competent, drug-resistant viral strains in the population and to infer the consequences of these mutations upon viral replication in vivo. Mutations described to confer resistance to the protease inhibitors Telaprevir, BILN2061, ITMN-191, SCH6 and Boceprevir; the NS5B polymerase inhibitor AG-021541; and to the NS4A antagonist ACH-806 were observed mostly as sporadic, unrelated cases, at frequencies between 0.3% and 2.8% in the population, including two patients with possible multidrug resistance. Collectively, however, 8.6% of the patients infected with genotype 1a and 1.4% of those infected with genotype 1b carried at least one dominant resistance mutation. Viral loads were high in the majority of these patients, suggesting that drug-resistant viral strains might achieve replication levels comparable to nonresistant viruses in vivo. Conclusion: Naturally occurring dominant STAT-C resistance mutations are common in treatment-naïve patients infected with HCV genotype 1. Their influence on treatment outcome should further be characterized to evaluate possible benefits of drug resistance testing for individual tailoring of drug combinations when treatment options are limited due to previous nonresponse to peginterferon and ribavirin.

No abstract

, and develop few if any amyloid deposits spontaneously. 10 months after amyloid injection, deposits were detected in the tongue, stomach, intestine, lungs, heart, liver, and kidneys. The intensity of deposition increased thereafter, whereas no amyloid was detected in distilled water-injected SAMR1 mice, even after 20 months. The deposited amyloid was composed of endogenous APOAIIB with a different amyloid fibril conformation. The injection of these amyloid fibrils of APOAIIB (AApoAII(B)) induced earlier and more severe amyloidosis in SAMR1 mice than the injection of AApoAII(C) amyloid fibrils. Thus, AApoAII(C) from amyloidogenic mice could induce a conformational change of less amyloidogenic APOAIIB to a different amyloid fibril structure, which could also induce amyloidosis in the less amyloidogenic strain. These results provide important insights into the pathogenesis of amyloid diseases.

No abstract

Preformed amyloid ¢brils accelerate conformational changes of amyloid precursor proteins and result in rapid extension of amyloid ¢brils in vitro. We injected various kinds of amyloid ¢brils into mice with amyloidogenic apoAII gene (Apoa2 C ). The most severe amyloid depositions were detected in the tissues of mice injected with mouse AApoAII(C) amyloid ¢brils. Mild amyloid depositions were also detected in the tissues of mice that were injected with other types of ¢brils, including synthetic peptides and recombinant proteins. However, no amyloid depositions were found in mice that were injected with non-amyloid ¢bril proteins. These results demonstrated that a common structure of amyloid ¢brils could serve as a seed for amyloid ¢bril formation in vivo. ß 2004 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of the Federation of European Biochemical Societies.